Global Warming Is A Hoax WEF is Treason U.S. Pres. Joe Biden (1942-) and Klaus Schwab (1938-) Apple's 1984 Big Brother Commercial

What is the difference between the WEF's 'Great Reset' proposal and Communism or Socialism?

TLW's WEFscope™ (World Economic Forum Historyscope)

By T.L. Winslow (TLW), the Historyscoper™

© Copyright by T.L. Winslow. All Rights Reserved.

Original Pub. Date: May 10, 2022. Last Update: June 23, 2022.


Karl Marx (1818-83) Friedrich Engels (1820-95) Joseph Stalin (1878-1953) and Vladmir Lenin (1870-1924) Mao Tse-Tung (1893-1976) Vladimir Putin (1952-) Xi Jinping (1953-)

A Lesson in TLW's New Real Climate Science Course


A complete historyscope on the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its role in the great U.N.-led global Marxist revolution now hitting the West like a hurricane making landfall. These are the times that try men's souls.

Contains 300+ hyperlinks, 80+ images, and 70+ videos.

A super-important source of information based on my unique historyscoping technique that lays out history chronologically from a top-down view while supplying hyperlinks to verify facts and go as deep as you want, a pansophist's history course that can only be studied online with a live Internet connection. My most timely and important historyscope. Study it intently, reload it frequently for updates, and tell your friends! Place a watch on it to be informed when it's updated, using a free Web site change monitor.

--------------------------------

What is the difference between the WEF's 'Great Reset' proposal and Communism or Socialism?

-------------------------------

Tom Paine (1737-1809)

Thomas "Tom" Paine (1737-1809)

THESE ARE THE TIMES THAT TRY MEN'S SOULS. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated. Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER" and if being bound in that manner, is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth. Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God.

- The Crisis by Thomas Paine, Dec. 23, 1776

The Great Reset is a massive plan to completely reorganize the entire structure of the planet - economically, socially, environmentally, and politically. Nothing will be untouched by the plan. Global Governance is the goal...

The Great Reset is the reinvention of communism. It is the total destruction of our culture, economic system, and personal freedom. The forces behind this care not one whit about you, your future hopes and dreams. It’s about power - their power to enforce an agenda of global control.

The incredible fact every American must understand is that the Great Reset is being enforced through your local city council, county commission, state legislature, and federal edict. It can be stopped - but only if you finally stand up and say NO! Your time for decision - to live free or to just submit - has finally come. The choice is yours.

- The Great Reset: Will You Submit Or Stop It?, Tom DeWeese, Pres., Am. Policy Center

Let's call the Great Reset what it is: TYRANNY.

Bill Gates Covid/NWO George Soros (1930-) Bill Gates (1955-) Bill Gates (1955-) Bill Gates (1955-) and Tedros Adhanom (1965-) Jeff Bezos (1964-) Mark Zuckerberg (1984-)

To answer the question: The only difference between the WEF's Great Reset and Communism or Socialism is that the former is backed by corporation-owning leftist billionaires like George Soros (Gyorgy Schwartz) (1930-) (open borders mastermind), William Henry "Bill" Gates III (1955-) (global vaccine mastermind, and most-hated man on Earth), Jeff Bezos (Jorgensen) (1964-), and Mark Zuckerberg (1984-), who hate free competition because they got rich via monopolies and no surprise want to permanently keep them. They are either too stupid to know how evil Communism can become, or too smart.

After the initial global Marxist revolution fizzled with the fall of the Soviet Union on Xmas 1991, the goal of the global Marxists switched to framing CO2 emissions as evil in order to trick Western leaders into becoming useful idiots who will destroy the fossil fuel industry that underpins the old non-woke mainly white Western capitalist world, only this time they're luring leftist billionaire capitalists who should be their greatest enemies into selling out to make as much money from the renewable energy boondoggle as possible, resulting in the reduction of the once proud Western world to a state of total servitude to the elite masters who will ultimately have the power to cull the herd and even determine its racial mix in a borderless global Marxist police state filled with a happy family of serfs who love their Dear Leaders and are afraid to think for themselves and rock the boat. After incorporation into the Borg-like U.N. Reset, there will be a new hi-tech Dark Ages where everybody stays at home in starvation-diet hive cities while slaved to the Internet as their sole source of news and information, carefully censored to support the regime so everybody gets their minds right - everybody except the elitists who run the U.N. and are above its laws, and who will enjoy a life that will make the old Roman emperors jealous, at least they think so, although they might end up like the useful idiot intelligentsia under Lenin and Stalin.

What if you knew that the gods of Mount Olympus were playing poker with your souls as chips? Would you just keep munching the grass like sheep while they planned to shear you and eat your meat, or would you fight back? This is pretty much what's really happening now with elite global Marxists, who are never going to give you a chip in the big game. So if you value your children's future, get serious and study the work of the thin line of independent researchers manning the wall while you still can. Consider this your introductory primer for a lifetime of study.

--------------------
Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
--------------------

Klaus Schwab (1938-) Klaus Schwab (1938-) Klaus Schwab (1938-) Private jets at Davos Who Wants to Stop Climate Change? Klaus Schwab (1938-)

Do you watch the news? Notice the almost daily references to "Build Back Better" by the Democrats, which is simply a slogan for implementing the Great Reset which was proposed at their 50th annual meeting in June 2020 in the E ski resort town of Davos, Switzerland (pop. 11K) by German Nazi-looking old fart Klaus Schwab (1938), 1971` founder and executive chmn. of the increasingly zany Looney Tunes World Economic Forum (WEF), populated with obscenely wealthy billionaires. Speaking of zany, the slogan of the Great Reset is "You will own nothing and be happy."

This Is A Termite

Too bad, as Am. Christian pastor Charles J. "Charlie" Kirk (1993-) of Turning Point USA puts it, to reset something you first have to break it into a million pieces, and what the globalists want is to break the entire system of nation-states and borders and replace it with a global govt., Marxist in principle even if they hide the name.

U.S. Pres. Joe Biden (1942-) U.S. Pres. Joe Biden (1942-) and Klaus Schwab (1938-)

Ever since the coup that put global Marxist puppet U.S. pres.#46 Joseph Robinette "Joe" Biden Jr. (1942-) in the White House on Jan. 20, 2021, the "woke" "progressive" Democratic Party has been working relentlessly like true Communist revolutionaries to take down the last stumbling block to the true goal of global Marxism, the once-great United States of America, founder of the oil industry, home of capitalism, and arsenal of democracy, which was long slated for elimination for being too-white and too successful, among other things, and which fought long and hard to stop global Marxism, and mistakenly declared victory in the early 1990s with the fall of the Soviet Union, making it a sucker for the global Marxists' deep penetration of the govt., academia, corporate boards, and other power centers that allowed an entire generation to be brainwashed to hate the U.S. and love romantic Socialism/Communism. Demographics did the rest.

No surprise, on June 12, 2021 after vowing to "end fossil fuel" on Sept. 6, 2019, Pres. Biden announced his big plan to steal $40 trillion from taxpayers to fund his Great Reset.

Joe Biden's Energy Jihad

Biden’s War on Driving. High gas prices and car prices are part of the plan.

The first time I heard Joe Biden’s campaign slogan of ‘Build Back Better’, it struck me as strange because it was just so clunky and inherently meaningless. Build what back, better than what, it just kind of hovers in the ether, meaning nothing and saying nothing. But as it turns out, it says a lot, so much so that it turns out to be the main slogan to the impending New World Order of the United Nations. What an odd choice for a campaign slogan for a United States candidate for president, unless….

“Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.” Habakkuk 1:5 (KJB)

Unless it’s connected to something called The Great Reset, unless it’s connected to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, unless it’s connected to this entire COVID-19 global trojan horse of the New World Order. Which, as it turns out, is exactly what the truth is. Joe Biden chose ‘Build Back Better’ as his campaign slogan because he is the chosen vessel of the New World Order, and a Biden Harris administration would tear down the United States from sea to shining sea. Build Back Better? Only if you’re a globalist.

Joe Biden is absolutely a globalist who campaigned for president on the ‘Build Back Better’ platform, and now he has to pay the piper who made him president. We told you from the beginning that Biden was only put in because he would be the puppet to help finish destroying America and install the New World Order. This is exactly what he is doing at the G7. Now we can see that the COVID crisis and crashing of the world’s economies was done in order to bring in the New World Order. It was all planned, it was all intentional.

- Joe Biden At G7 Announces $40,000,000,000,000 Plan To ‘Build Back Better For The World’ In Stunning Globalist Move Towards Great Reset

The WEF is an elitist and unholy alliance of socialist ideologues and corporatists, all of whom want to own and control literally everyone and everything .

This 788-word press release below speaks for itself. An intellectual/political elite is all-in to assume the ‘commanding heights’ of the U.S. energy, just as is the case in the UK and EU.

It was once said that "war is the health of the state.” In our time, climate change policy (Al Gore’s ‘central organizing principle‘) is the health of the State at home and abroad. Economic freedom hangs in the balance with the commoners fighting against the elite.

Make no mistake: the recent drill, baby, drill out of Washington, DC (typified by DOE Secretary Granholm at CERAWeek22) is window dressing. "We are going to get rid of fossil fuels,” an unscripted Joe Biden himself stated.

The climate alarmist agenda of Biden’s puppeteers is being rushed into play to create what Milton Friedman was warned against, "the tyranny of the status quo.” Elections are coming, and citizen-voters know the real Biden agenda.

WASHINGTON — Today, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced a coordinated climate policy strategy that will:

Bring to bear the full force of the Treasury Department on domestic and international policymaking, leveraging finance and financial risk mitigation to confront the threat of climate change. These actions will position the economy for strong and sustainable growth consistent with a net-zero emissions future.

To implement this strategy, Treasury will focus on the broad range of its climate-related policy work connected to 1) climate transition finance, 2) climate-related economic and tax policy, and 3) climate-related financial risks. As part of this strategy, Treasury is also creating a new Climate Hub and appointing a Climate Counselor to coordinate and lead many of its efforts to address climate change.

Treasury’s unique responsibilities to lead on a range of programs related to climate change - including economic, financial sector, and government policies - will be reflected in the expanded climate strategy work program. The Treasury Climate Hub will coordinate and enhance existing climate-related activities by harnessing the tools, capabilities, and expertise from across the Department - including from Domestic Finance, Economic Policy, International Affairs, and Tax Policy. With a view of all Treasury climate initiatives, the Hub will enable Treasury to move nimbly and efficiently in prioritizing climate action.

Treasury’s first Climate Counselor is John E. Morton, a recognized leader in the field of climate finance. Mr. Morton brings to Treasury more than 25 years of experience in emerging markets, investment finance, and economic and environmental policy. As Climate Counselor, he will lead the Climate Hub, report directly to and advise the Secretary on a broad range of climate matters, and focus in particular on Treasury’s efforts to facilitate and unlock the financing needed for investments to achieve a net-zero economy at home and abroad.

"Climate change presents new challenges and opportunities for the U.S. economy. The steep consequences of our actions demand that the Treasury Department make climate change a top priority,” said Secretary Janet L. Yellen. "Climate change requires economy-wide investments by industry and government as well as actions to measure and mitigate climate-related risks to households, businesses, and our financial sector.

Finance and financial incentives will play a crucial role in addressing the climate crisis at home and abroad and in providing capital for opportunities to transform the economy. I look forward to working with John and our team to leverage their expertise and ensure that Treasury is doing everything it can to respond to climate change while creating opportunities that strengthen our economy.”

- Climate Change, Climate Hub, Climate Counselor: What Gives?, Apr. 1, 2022

Owning and controlling everything means remaining above the laws they seek to impose on others, like gods.

Day 2 in DAVOS, another day of grotesque hypocrisy.

Private jets and heli rides for the climate preachers.

Extreme privacy for those who want increased surveillance.

Armed police to protect an organization against gun control.

What’s more, armed police are being employed to protect the very attendees who seek to take, and keep, guns from others.

"Ordinary people are having to change our lifestyles and give more money to the government in order to offset the carbon footprint from the elites, it’s sickening," Sophie Corcoran tweeted Tuesday, noting that, as the WEF attendees are plotting to institute a global tax to impoverish others, they appear to be gobbling up luxurious items, like Rolex watches."

"Our team spoke to the Rolex store in davos on the promenade who said that they have sold loads of Rolex watches, so they’re discussing how they want to make a global tax and put us in poverty with their green Agenda, they’re buying their Rolex’s."

"The elites who want us to have digital ID, increased surveillance and want to watch our every move, want immense privacy for themselves and have no accountability. Hypocrites."

- Reporter: ‘Another Day of Grotesque Hypocrisy’ at World Economic Forum - Guns, Jets, Helicopters, Extreme Privacy

The Mayflower Plymouth Rock, 1620 'Pilgrims Going to Church' by George Henry Boughton (1833-1905), 1867 William Bradford (1590-1657) The First Thanksgiving, 1621
What are the roots? Why did the U.S. fight Marxism so long and so hard? It goes back to Dec. 21, 1620, when the lily-white English Christian Bible-thumping Puritan Pilgrims on the Mayflower landed on Plymouth Rock near the tip of Cape Cod, modern-day Mass., establishing the Plymouth Colony with the dream of escaping the rule of the established Anglican govt. of England, which these Bible-thumpers considered themselves too pure to bow to because they considered Anglicanism to be incurably infected with Roman Catholicism and the Pope to be the Antichrist. Too bad, they didn't have a clue how to survive in Massachusetts, and they didn't bring much food or fishing equipment with them, causing half of them to starve the first winter, until luckily, the local Wampanoag Indians befriended them (in returning for pledging to help them fight their enemies) and taught them how to plant corn, harvest oysters, cod, and cranberries, and eat turkeys and pumpkin pie, resulting in a good harvest and causing the First Thanksgiving to be celebrated in fall 1621.

Too bad, despite new settlers regularly arriving, after reading some passages in the New Testament about the First Christians sharing all things in common, they tried to establish a Communist utopia where it was required that "All profits & benefits that are got by trade, working, fishing, or any other means" be placed in the colony's common stores, and that "All such persons as are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions out of the common stock" , resulting in many turning into loafers, so that no surprise, in winter 1622 another cruddy fall harvest caused the colony to suffer its Second Starving Time, in which hundreds died, causing Gov. William Bradford (1590-1657) to write the soundbyte: "All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery. At length, after much debate of things, the Governor (with the advice of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves; in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression. The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by some of later times; that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young men, that were most able and fit for labour and service, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labours and victuals, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought themselves in the like condition, and one as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them. And would have been worse if they had been men of another condition. Let none object this is men's corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in His wisdom saw another course fitter for them."

So they scrapped Communism for greedy capitalism, and starting with the harvest of 1623 the colony had plenty to eat, although until the harvest they had to exist mainly on seafood, plus a 6-week drought beginning in June almost killed their crops until they had a big prayer meeting in July that was followed by two weeks of rain, confirming their belief that God was on the side of Puritanism and Capitalism. Ever after, Americans celebrate Thanksgiving with a big heavy turkey dinner with all the trimmings in remembrance of the First Thanksgiving, Capitalism, and the Bible God. No wonder that the atheist Communist woke movement's #1 goal is to cancel U.S. history and replace it with the woke Marxist 1619 Project version that starts in 1619 in the Anglican govt.-sponsored colony of Virginia instead and claims that the U.S. was founded just to exploit African slaves, causing its blind worshipers to topple statues of the U.S. Founding Fathers and replace them with Marxist heroes. I guess they forgot that the Spanish and Portuguese enslaved Africans for centuries before the English, and that Arab Muslim slave traders enslaved not only Africans but white Euros long before they did, and continued to modern times, buying African slaves captured by neighboring tribes, and hijacking Euro (incl. U.S.) ships on the Barbary Coast to capture juicy white slaves after claiming that the Quran told them to because they were infidels.

One hundred fifty years later, capitalism got its theoretical underpinnings.

From my cool Economistscope:

Adam Smith (1723-90)

On Mar. 9, 1776 Scottish U. of Glasgow economist and Calvinist minister Adam Smith (1723-90) ("Father of Economics") pub. his epic 1K-page capitalist Bible Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which advances the theory of laissez-faire economics, a "system of natural liberty", and the concept of the "invisible hand", becoming a bestseller, selling out in a few weeks; "Consumption is the sole end and purpose of all production, and the interest of the producer ought to be attended to, only so far as it may be necessary for promoting that of the consumer"; "The real price of everything is the toil and trouble of acquiring it"; "The propensity to truck, barter, and exchange... is common to all men, and to be found in no other race of animals"; "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest"; "Every individual endeavors to employ his capital so that its produce may be of greatest value. He generally neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. He intends only his own security, only his own gain. And he is in this led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it"; "To found a great empire for the sole purpose of raising up a people of customers may at first sight appear unfit for a nation of shopkeepers, but extremely fit for a nation whose Government is influenced by shopkeepers"; "The discovery of America, and that of a passage to the East Indies by the Cape of Good Hope, are the two greatest and most important events recorded in the history of mankind"; "The first duty of the sovereign, that of protecting the society from the violence and invasion of other independent societies, can be performed only by means of a military force"; discusses the excess burden of taxation AKA deadweight loss or distortionary cost.
Rev. Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834) Paul Ralph Ehrlich (1932-)

In 1798 English economist Rev. Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834) anon. pub. An Essay on the Principle of Population spreading Malthusianism, alarm about unregulated population growth caused by the Industrial Revolution. On the surface it's eminently rational, namely, exponential pop. growth outstrips linear food supply growth. Too bad, it makes the epic mistake of underestimating people and not thinking they can solve their problems as they arise, making every doomsday prediction so far into a brain fart. The latest iteration of Malthusianism began with the 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb by Philly-born Stanford U. biology prof. Paul Ralph Ehrlich (1932-) and his wife Anne, which features the laffer soundbyte: "The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate."

Karl Marx (1818-83) Friedrich Engels (1820-95) Socialism is Communism in Disguise

In 1848 the Communist Manifesto was published by German philosophers Karl Heinrich Marx (1818-83) and Friedrich Engels (1820-95) (rich capitalist Engels financially supported poor Jewish scholar Marx), claiming that capitalism is evil and must be abolished, containing the famous soundbytes: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles"; "A specter is haunting Europe - the specter of Communism"; "Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries unite!"

Communism's main program is:

Back in that day Europe was run by lily-white Christian monarchies (AKA the Old Order) (split between Protestant and Catholic countries), causing all who hated being oppressed by them to attack them on all those points, namely, being Christian, being white, or supporting an aristocracy, adding the new idea of class struggle of the workers vs. the capitalist pigs, romanticizing it like the days of Robin Hood and his Merry Men against evil King John. After two horrible world wars, both of which featured lily-white Germany as the bad guy, causing the downfall of the Old Order, the United Nations (U.N.) was founded in 1945 to forever prevent any white racist regime from threatening to take over the world, ironically bankrolled by the U.S. with its HQ in New York City donated by John D. Rockefeller.

Too bad, every Communist revolution, while attractive to poor people who don't know what capitalism is, causing them to view themselves as romantic heroes, once it succeeds, soon finds that Communism doesn't work, and the state must gain absolute power to force the herd to work for the abstract common good rather than their own personal advancement, heedless of Adam Smith's Invisible Hand, which continues to operate. In practice, Communism doesn't work because the govt. can't dictate the value of money, and reality sets in, so no wonder the proletariat eventually begin grumbling, first chipping away at Communism with an underground economy before throwing off the Communist Party completely to embrace you guessed it. Red China is so vast that its Communist govt. has managed to stay in power by ' letting the underground capitalist economy go above ground, as long as its millionaire capitalists claim to be good Communists. <

In 1946 the Five Eyes alliance was created to share signals intelligence between the UKUSA (pr. yew-kew-zah) countries: U.S., U.K., Australia, Canada, New Zealand, growing in the Internet Age to frightening proportions:

The Five Eyes agencies are playing a dirty game. They have found ways to infiltrate all aspects of modern communications networks: forcing companies to hand over their customers’ data under secret orders, and secretly tapping fibre optic cables between the same companies’ data centres anyway; accessing sensitive financial data through SWIFT, the world’s financial messaging system; spending years negotiating an international agreement to regulate access to the data through a democratic and accountable process, and then hacking the networks to get direct access; threatening politicians with trumped-up threats of impending cyber war while conducting intrusion operations that weaken the security of networks globally; and sabotaging encryption standards and standards bodies, thereby undermining the ability of internet users to secure information.

The U.N. seemed to start out good, but it has since gone unhinged, considering the existence of any pure white population to be a threat, and blaming white countries like the U.S. for being beautiful and achieving an unprecedented level of economic freedom, prosperity, and even personal freedom. After discounting the brilliant U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights as a piece of toilet paper written by racists - never mind the colossal existential battle to free the African slaves that pitted whites against each other - the hardcore global Marxists, oblivious to the horrors of their Soviet, Chinese, and Cuban Marxist utopias are eager to throw the baby out with the bathwater and destroy the U.S. as a nation by opening its borders to unlimited immigration of people who don't even speak English or know about its history and traditions.

In short, they want to cancel the United States of America. For this goal telling any lie that helps the cause is on the table, and with CO2-caused global warming they think they've hit the jackpot, allowing them to make being beautiful, happy, and comfortable, with unlimited horizons as racist and therefore evil. They don't even want to consider raising non-white countries to the level of white countries, while leaving them intact. They want to reduce all countries to the lowest common denominator, and cancel all nation-states after opening all borders and fostering a raceless classless population, although in practice they treat all non-white countries as sacred cows that are allowed to be as racist as they want, as long as they go along with their Zero Carbon boondoggle. Not even all of them, because they give India and Red China free passes to emit all the CO2 they want, even by nasty coal plants, as long as they go along with their program to break the back of the remnants of old white Christian Europe, especially that in the U.S. Other global solutions such as relocating each racial group to its own geographic area and helping them advance in parallel are off the table, especially if this would allow world population to keep growing with no elite masters manning a kill switch. Could this really be based on the fear that the longtime failed African race can join an equal confederacy of race-based nations as an equal, or even become the leader? Not that "races" really exist, but there are large populations who breed true and share a common heritage, and messing with that reality would be explosive.

Communist Genocide

Speaking of kill switch, when people are first being brainwashed into Marxism, they are never told that "In the midst of a Communist takeover it's practically de rigueur to include a genocide." Genocide

David Joel Horowitz (1939-)

The false utopia worshiped by all leftists always results in horror, as best described by Am. conserative David Joel Horowitz (1939)-:

The crisis currently facing our nation is a crisis of faith - faith in the Constitution that has shaped our destiny, faith in the rule of law, and faith in the principle of equality before the law. The root cause of the lawlessness that is consuming our country is the monopoly of the executive power in Washington by a political party that has fallen under the control of the radical Left. This Left describes itself as “progressive,” but is focused on the goal of “re-imagining” American institutions and principles, in other words of dismantling the constitutional order that created the prosperity and freedoms that have shaped this country since its beginnings.

Having been born into this political Left and then rejected it, I have acquired an intimate perspective on its nature, and the threat it poses to the American future, which is grave. I was raised by Communists who always referred to themselves as “progressives,” and were sworn enemies of America and its institutions, as was I. We saw ourselves as warriors for social justice, acting on the “right side” of history.

We could not have been more mistaken. The “moral arc” of history is not “bent towards justice,” as progressives like to say. If it were, the 20th Century would be the most enlightened instead of the scene of the greatest atrocities and oppressions on human record. Worse yet, for this progressive myth, these atrocities and oppressions were perpetrated by progressives in the name of “social justice.”

The practical achievement of the revolutionaries was the dismantling of whole societies, and their reconstruction as national prisons, and slave labor camps. Supported by progressives everywhere, Communists bankrupted whole continents while killing more than 100 million people - in peacetime - in order to realize their radical schemes. Their atrocities and failures continued until the day they saw their progressive future collapse under its own weight. This failure was entirely predictable because as every similar attempt to “re-imagine society” and change it by force has shown, it is simply beyond the power of human beings to create a “just” world.

- David Horowitz: ‘Radicals’ Are Racist Criminals Driving America Towards The Abyss

Marxists by any other name

Right now the West has a generation of millennials who were brainwashed to love Marx but try to hide that name with bastard ideologies like wokeism and critical race theory, and don't want to learn true U.S. history and the wisdom of its Founding Fathers but see the lily white faces and want to cancel it. Too bad, they are setting themselves up to learn the old lessons the hard way, the School of Hard Knocks, groan. The root cause is envy. Always the formula is the same, Make a group that's poor think it's an oppressed class to make them fight to force the rich to give to the poor until everybody is poor, then hope they don't revolt, or, To each sacred cow group according to their class membership, from each non-sacred cow group according to their ability to be stolen blind, starting with their wealth then slave labor. Communism makes a great romantic revolutionary dream with people who don't have any capital and see the evil capitalists who do, yet when they get capital they will fight like hell to keep the govt. from taking it from them, which is why Communist societies aren't Christlike utopias but giant slave labor camps with the elite riding on top like scum on a pond.

If you still believe in the fundamentalist Protestant interpretation of the Bible, the Devil knows his time is short so he's hell-bent on stirring up strife like a roaring lion on the loose until Christ comes with his army of angels to throw him and his followers into the Lake of Fire and gather up his true believers to be with him forever in the Kingdom of Heaven. Too bad, I don't believe in Christ and his End of the World and Last Day, and can't prove it in court but just know the world will still be here a billion years from now, so I'm throwing in my lot with the U.S. Founding Fathers, who were all historyscopers like me and were perched on a unique ledge to see history all the way back to Ancient Greece and formulate solutions to all the problems with human govt. Need I add that their example initially spread like wildfire around the world, including to Europe, Asia, Central and South America, but got so mangled by non-historyscopers twisted with hate and envy that it turned into a horror show starting with the 1793-4 Reign of Terror in France, which began a chain reaction soon leading to Marx and Engels.

As a historyscoper I wish I were born 500 years from now to see how the U.S. emerged stronger than ever in the ashes of Marxism, and its political principles were adopted by a sane non-Marxist world govt. that enjoys permanent peace, prosperity, liberty, and justice for all. The racial issue is the big wild card, but I'm of the opinion that it will ultimately become a non-issue when science becomes so advanced that the genetic makeup of an embryo can be programmed, and a fair U.S.-style world govt. will er, forget it.

Back to the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Politics Is As Fake As Pro Wrestling Klaus Schwab (1938-) Samuel Phillips Huntington (1927-2008)

From Davos Man: His World:

First, "who are they?" The current 100 WEF full members ("Strategic Partners") are drawn from the largest corporations in the world, together with their owners and managers (referred to as Davos Man).

The list of corporations, owners and managers who control the WEF is not disclosed and membership can only be inferred indirectly. However, the WEF members do not act alone, but have developed various groups of globally distributed trainees who generally act in accordance with the detailed policies and positions developed and distributed by WEF leadership. These training programs have been operating for over three decades, resulting in placement, distribution and rapid advancement of many thousands of WEF-trained operatives throughout the world.

German-born WEF chairman Klaus Schwab (1938-) (who founded the WEF in 1971) has famously claimed that these operatives have been strategically inserted into key positions in various governments, as well as influential spots in key industries such as media, finance, and technology.

"Davos Man" is a term coined in 2004 by former Harvard University Director of the Center for International Affairs Professor Dr. Samuel Phillips Huntington (1927-2008) to define an emerging group of economic elites who are members of a social caste which has "little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that are thankfully vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the elite’s global operations."

The title of his prescient 2004 article published in The National Interest Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite is telling.

The WEF is one of the most zany contradictions ever seen, since it is populated by the billionaires who have systematically destroyed everyone and everything they touched to make a quick buck and avoid taxes, yet now think they can pontificate on what's best for their own victims. On Jan. 18, 2022 Peter S. Goodman pub. Davos Man: How the Billionaires Devoured the World , with the ad blurb: "The New York Times’s Global Economics Correspondent masterfully reveals how billionaires’ systematic plunder of the world - brazenly accelerated during the pandemic - has transformed 21st-century life and dangerously destabilized democracy."

"Goodman proceeds to explain that the label as used by the political scientist 'referred directly to anyone who regularly made the journey to Davos' to attend the annual World Economic Forum. But, like many others, Goodman uses it 'as shorthand for those who occupy the stratosphere of the globe-trotting class, the billionaires - predominantly white and male - who wield unsurpassed influence over the political realm while promoting a notion that has captured decisive force across major economies: when the rules are organized around greater prosperity for those who already enjoy most of it, everyone’s a winner.”

Prince Charles of Wales (1948-)

One of the most zany useful idiot WEF members is Britain's physics-ignoramus Prince Charles of Wales (1948-), who regularly stokes alarm about climate change, on Jan. 22, 2020 calling global warming the greatest threat humanity has faced, on June 3, 2020 calling it a chance to reset the global economy, on Sept. 21, 2020 calling for a "Marshall-like Plan", then on Nov. 1, 2021 upping it to a call for a "warlike" approach to fighting global warming.

-----------------

Classical Marxism sought to control the means of production of goods, while modern Marxism seeks to control the means of production of information. When leftists talk about their cancel culture they seriously mean to erase all history of the free mainly-white capitalist world and start over with Year 1. How convenient for the Red Chinese, who were nourished from day one by this world while believing they deserved to overtake and rule it forever. The very word "China" means "Center" - of the world, meaning that everyone outside it is an uncivilized barbarian that they milk through the fence like Elvis' cow. Now in the Internet Age, they want to monopolize trade while maintaining that us-them divide, which at least means they aren't planning on blowing the world up, just ruling it.

In Dec. 2021 Michael Rectenwald of Hillsdale College published the essay "What Is the Great Reset?", which boils it down to a Chinese takeover of the West, illuminating the incestuous relationships between U.S. (mainly Democratic) politicians with the Red Chinese. The old adage "East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet" is being replaced by "The civilized Chinese are taming the Western barbarians". It is so cogent and important that I have no choice but to quote it in length.

What Is the Great Reset - Michael Rectenwald

Klaus Schwab (1938-) Thierry Malleret (1961-) Richard L. Florida (1957-)

Is the Great Reset a conspiracy theory imagining a vast left-wing plot to establish a totalitarian one-world government? No. Despite the fact that some people may have spun conspiracy theories based on it - with some reason, as we will see - the Great Reset is real.

Indeed, just last year [July 13, 2020], Klaus Martin Schwab (1938-), founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF) - a famous organization made up of the world’s political, economic, and cultural elites that meets annually in Davos, Switzerland - and Thierry Malleret (1961-), co-founder and main author of the Monthly Barometer, published a book called COVID-19: The Great Reset. In the book, they define the Great Reset as a means of addressing the "weaknesses of capitalism" that were purportedly exposed by the COVID pandemic.

But the idea of the Great Reset goes back much further. It can be traced at least as far back as the inception of the WEF, originally founded as the European Management Forum, in 1971. In that same year, Schwab, an engineer and economist by training, published his first book, Modern Enterprise Management in Mechanical Engineering. It was in this book that Schwab first introduced the concept he would later call "stakeholder capitalism," arguing "that the management of a modern enterprise must serve not only shareholders but all stakeholders to achieve long-term growth and prosperity." Schwab and the WEF have promoted the idea of stakeholder capitalism ever since. They can take credit for the stakeholder and public-private partnership rhetoric and policies embraced by governments, corporations, non-governmental organizations, and international governance bodies worldwide.

The specific phrase "Great Reset" came into general circulation over a decade ago, with the publication of a 2010 book, The Great Reset: How New Ways of Living and Working Drive Post-Crash Prosperity, by American urban studies scholar Richard L. Florida (1957-). Written in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, Florida’s book argued that the 2008 economic crash was the latest in a series of Great Resets - including the Long Depression of the 1870s and the Great Depression of the 1930s - which he defined as periods of paradigm-shifting systemic innovation. Four years after Florida’s book was published, at the 2014 annual meeting of the WEF, Schwab declared: "What we want to do in Davos this year . . . is to push the reset button" - and subsequently the image of a reset button would appear on the WEF’s website.

In 2018 and 2019, the WEF organized two events that became the primary inspiration for the current Great Reset project - and also, for obvious reasons, fresh fodder for conspiracy theorists. (Don’t blame me for the latter - all I’m doing is relating the historical facts.) In May 2018, the WEF collaborated with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security to conduct "CLADE X", a simulation of a national pandemic response. Specifically, the exercise simulated the outbreak of a novel strain of a human parainfluenza virus, with genetic elements of the Nipah virus, called CLADE X. The simulation ended with a news report stating that in the face of CLADE X, without effective vaccines, "experts tell us that we could eventually see 30 to 40 million deaths in the U.S. and more than 900 million around the world - twelve percent of the global population." Clearly, preparation for a global pandemic was in order.

In October 2019, the WEF collaborated with Johns Hopkins and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on another pandemic exercise, "Event 201", which simulated an international response to the outbreak of a novel coronavirus. This was two months before the COVID outbreak in China became news and five months before the World Health Organization declared it a pandemic, and it closely resembled the future COVID scenario, including incorporating the idea of asymptomatic spread.

The CLADE X and Event 201 simulations anticipated almost every eventuality of the actual COVID crisis, most notably the responses by governments, health agencies, the media, tech companies, and elements of the public. The responses and their effects included worldwide lockdowns, the collapse of businesses and industries, the adoption of biometric surveillance technologies, an emphasis on social media censorship to combat "misinformation," the flooding of social and legacy media with "authoritative sources," widespread riots, and mass unemployment.

In addition to being promoted as a response to COVID, the Great Reset is promoted as a response to climate change. In 2017, the WEF published a paper entitled, "We Need to Reset the Global Operating System to Achieve the [United Nations Sustainable Development Goals]." On June 13, 2019, the WEF signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the United Nations to form a partnership to advance the "UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development." Shortly after that, the WEF published the "United Nations-World Economic Forum Strategic Partnership Framework for the 2030 Agenda," promising to help finance the UN’s climate change agenda and committing the WEF to help the UN "meet the needs of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," including providing assets and expertise for "digital governance."

In June 2020, at its 50th annual meeting, the WEF announced the Great Reset’s official launch, and a month later Schwab and Malleret published their book on COVID and the Great Reset. The book declared that COVID represents an "opportunity [that] can be seized"; that "we should take advantage of this unprecedented opportunity to reimagine our world"; that "the moment must be seized to take advantage of this unique window of opportunity"; and that "[f]or those fortunate enough to find themselves in industries ‘naturally’ resilient to the pandemic"—think here of Big Tech companies like Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon - "the crisis was not only more bearable, but even a source of profitable opportunities at a time of distress for the majority."

The Great Reset aims to usher in a bewildering economic amalgam - Schwab’s stakeholder capitalism - which I have called "corporate socialism" and Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben has called "communist capitalism."

In brief, stakeholder capitalism involves the behavioral modification of corporations to benefit not shareholders, but stakeholders - individuals and groups that stand to benefit or lose from corporate behavior. Stakeholder capitalism requires not only corporate responses to pandemics and ecological issues such as climate change, "but also rethinking [corporations’] commitments to already-vulnerable communities within their ecosystems." This is the "social justice" aspect of the Great Reset. To comply with that, governments, banks, and asset managers use the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) index to squeeze non-woke corporations and businesses out of the market. The ESG index is essentially a social credit score that is used to drive ownership and control of production away from the non-woke or non-compliant.

One of the WEF’s many powerful "strategic partners," BlackRock, Inc., the world’s largest asset manager, is solidly behind the stakeholder model. In a 2021 letter to CEOs, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink declared that "climate risk is investment risk," and "the creation of sustainable index investments has enabled a massive acceleration of capital towards companies better prepared to address climate risk." The COVID pandemic, Fink wrote, accelerated the flow of funds toward sustainable investments:

We have long believed that our clients, as shareholders in your company, will benefit if you can create enduring, sustainable value for all of your stakeholders. . . . A s more and more investors choose to tilt their investments towards sustainability-focused companies, the tectonic shift we are seeing will accelerate further. And because this will have such a dramatic impact on how capital is allocated, every management team and board will need to consider how this will impact their company’s stock. Fink’s letter is more than a report to CEOs. It is an implicit threat: be woke or else...

In their recent book on the Great Reset, Schwab and Malleret pit "stakeholder capitalism" against "neoliberalism," defining the latter as "a corpus of ideas and policies . . . favouring competition over solidarity, creative destruction over government intervention, and economic growth over social welfare." In other words, "neoliberalism" refers to the free enterprise system. In opposing that system, stakeholder capitalism entails corporate cooperation with the state and vastly increased government intervention in the economy.

Proponents of the Great Reset hold "neoliberalism" responsible for our economic woes. But in truth, the governmental favoring of industries and players within industries - what used to be known as corporatism or economic fascism - has been the real source of what Schwab and his allies at the WEF decry.

While approved corporations are not necessarily monopolies, the tendency of the Great Reset is toward monopolization - vesting as much control over production and distribution in as few favored corporations as possible, while eliminating industries and producers deemed non-essential or inimical. To bring this reset about, Schwab writes, "[e]very country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed."

Another way of describing the goal of the Great Reset is "capitalism with Chinese characteristics" - a two-tiered economy, with profitable monopolies and the state on top and socialism for the majority below...

Several decades ago, as China’s growing reliance on the for-profit sectors of its economy could no longer be credibly denied by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), its leadership approved the slogan "socialism with Chinese characteristics" to describe its economic system. Formulated by Deng Xiaoping, the phrase was meant to rationalize the CCP’s allowance of for-profit development under a socialist political system. The CCP considered the privatization of the Chinese economy to be a temporary phase—lasting as long as 100 years if necessary - on the way to a communist society. Party leaders maintain that this approach has been necessary in China because socialism was introduced too early there, when China was a backward agrarian country. China needed a capitalist booster shot.

Stripped of its socialist ideological pretensions, the Chinese system amounts to a socialist or communist state increasingly funded by capitalist economic development. The difference between the former Soviet Union and contemporary China is that when it became obvious that a socialist economy had failed, the former gave up its socialist economic pretenses, while the latter has not.

The Great Reset represents the development of the Chinese system in the West, but in reverse. Whereas the Chinese political class began with a socialist political system and then introduced privately held for-profit production, the West began with capitalism and is now implementing a Chinese-style political system. This Chinese-style system includes vastly increased state intervention in the economy, on the one hand, and on the other, the kind of authoritarian measures that the Chinese government uses to control its population.

Schwab and Malleret write that if "the past five centuries in Europe and America" have taught us anything, it is that "acute crises contribute to boosting the power of the state. It’s always been the case and there is no reason it should be different with the COVID-19 pandemic."

The draconian lockdown measures employed by Western governments managed to accomplish goals of which corporate socialists in the WEF could only dream - above all, the destruction of small businesses, eliminating competitors for corporate monopolists favored by the state. In the U.S. alone, according to the Foundation for Economic Education, millions of small businesses closed their doors due to the lockdowns. Yelp data indicates that 60 percent of those closures are now permanent. Meanwhile companies like Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google enjoyed record gains.

Other developments that advance the Great Reset agenda have included unfettered immigration, travel restrictions for otherwise legal border crossing, the Federal Reserve’s unrestrained printing of money and the subsequent inflation, increased taxation, increased dependence on the state, broken supply chains, the restrictions and job losses due to vaccine mandates, and the prospect of personal carbon allowances.

Such policies reflect the "fairness" aspect of the Great Reset - fairness requires lowering the economic status of people in wealthier nations like the U.S. relative to that of people in poorer regions of the world. One of the functions of woke ideology is to make the majority in developed countries feel guilty about their wealth, which the elites aim to reset downwards - except, one notices, for the elites themselves, who need to be rich in order to fly in their private jets to Davos each year.

The Great Reset’s corporate stakeholder model overlaps with its governance and geopolitical model: states and favored corporations are combined in public-private partnerships and together have control of governance. This corporate-state hybrid is largely unaccountable to the constituents of national governments.

Governance is not only increasingly privatized, but also and more importantly, corporations are deputized as major additions to governments and intergovernmental bodies. The state is thereby extended, enhanced, and augmented by the addition of enormous corporate assets. As such, corporations become what I have called "governmentalities" - otherwise private organizations wielded as state apparatuses, with no obligation to answer to pesky voters. Since these corporations are multinational, the state essentially becomes globalist, whether or not a one-world government is ever formalized. As if the economic and governmental resets were not dramatic enough, the technological reset reads like a dystopian science fiction novel. It is based on the Fourth Industrial Revolution—or 4-IR for short. The first, second, and third industrial revolutions were the mechanical, electrical, and digital revolutions. The 4-IR marks the convergence of existing and emerging fields, including Big Data, artificial intelligence, machine learning, quantum computing, genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics. The foreseen result will be the merging of the physical, digital, and biological worlds, which presents a challenge to the ontologies by which we understand ourselves and the world, including the definition of a human being.

There is nothing original about this. Transhumanists and Singularitarians (prophets of technological singularity) such as Ray Kurzweil forecasted these and other revolutionary developments long ago. What’s different about the globalists’ vision of 4-IR is the attempt to harness it to the ends of the Great Reset.

If already existing 4-IR developments are any indication of the future, then the claim that it will contribute to human happiness is false. These developments include Internet algorithms that feed users prescribed news and advertisements and downrank or exclude banned content; algorithms that censor social media content and consign "dangerous" individuals and organizations to digital gulags; "keyword warrants" based on search engine inputs; apps that track and trace COVID violations and report offenders to the police; robot police with scanners to identify and round up the unvaccinated and other dissidents; and smart cities where residents are digital entities to be monitored, surveilled, and recorded, and where data on their every move is collected, collated, stored, and attached to a digital identity and a social credit score. In short, 4-IR technologies subject human beings to a kind of technological management that makes surveillance by the NSA look like child’s play. Schwab goes so far as to cheer developments that aim to connect human brains directly to the cloud for the sake of "data mining" our thoughts and memories. If successful, this would constitute a technological mastery over decision-making that would threaten human autonomy and undermine free will.

The 4-IR seeks to accelerate the merging of humans and machines, resulting in a world in which all information, including genetic information, is shared, and every action, thought, and motivation is known, predicted, and possibly precluded. Unless taken out of the hands of corporate-socialist technocrats, the 4-IR will eventually lead to a virtual and inescapable prison of body and mind.

In terms of the social order, the Great Reset promises inclusion in a shared destiny. But the subordination of so-called "netizens" implies economic and political disenfranchisement, a hyper-vigilance over self and others, and social isolation - or what Hannah Arendt called "organized loneliness" - on a global scale. This organized loneliness is already manifest in lockdowns, masking, social distancing, and the social exclusion of the unvaccinated. The title of the Ad Council’s March 2020 public service announcement—"Alone Together" - perfectly captures this sense of organized loneliness. In my recent book, Google Archipelago, I argued that leftist authoritarianism is the political ideology and modus operandi of what I call Big Digital, which is on the leading edge of a nascent world system. Big Digital is the communications, ideological, and technological arm of an emerging corporate-socialist totalitarianism. The Great Reset is the name that has since been given to the project of establishing this world system.

Just as Schwab and the WEF predicted, the COVID crisis has accelerated the Great Reset. Monopolistic corporations have consolidated their grip on the economy from above, while socialism continues to advance for the rest of us below. In partnership with Big Digital, Big Pharma, the mainstream media, national and international health agencies, and compliant populations, hitherto democratic Western states - think especially of Australia, New Zealand, and Austria - are being transformed into totalitarian regimes modeled after China.

But let me end on a note of hope. Because the goals of the Great Reset depend on the obliteration not only of free markets, but of individual liberty and free will, it is, perhaps ironically, unsustainable. Like earlier attempts at totalitarianism, the Great Reset is doomed to ultimate failure. That doesn’t mean, however, that it won’t, again like those earlier attempts, leave a lot of destruction in its wake - which is all the more reason to oppose it now and with all our might.

-------------------

Climate lockdown: Paper published in prestigious journal laments ‘democracy’ & calls for ‘authoritarian environmentalism’ modeled after COVID lockdowns to fight climate ’emergency’

Danish Academic: U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda

Conspiracy theories aside, there is something fishy about the Great Reset

More about sick deluded leftist billionaire Bill Gates and how he got on the wrong side:

Is Bill Gates being realistic about climate change? - by T.L. Winslow (TLW)

-----------------

Samuel Phillips Huntington (1927-2008) Francis Fukuyama (1952-)

Back to Harvard internat. affairs big brain Samuel Phillips Huntington (1927-2008). In 1993 he pub. The Clash of Civilizations, which claimed that the primary source of conflict in the post-Soviet Union world will be a cultural war between the West and the Islamic world. It was an attempted refutation of the 1992 book The End of History and the Last Man by Am. political scientist Yoshihiro Francis Fukuyama (1952-), which claimed that Western liberal democracy is the final form of human govt. They both turned out to be full of shit because global Marxism was so good at going underground.

Klaus Schwab (1938-) and his Young Global Leaders
More attention has been focused on World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab following an appearance by radio show host and anti-extremism expert Maajid Nawaz on the Joe Rogan Experience, where he told the show's namesake about the WEF.

Nawaz, who is one of many crying foul over the WEF's actions, said that the WEF was "embedding people in government who are subscribed to this agenda. The agenda of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum is the same agenda of Tony Blair. They call it, on their own website, the Great Reset. That's what they say themselves.

"In 2017 at Harvard he's saying... 'we'll penetrate these cabinets with our Young Global Leaders," he says, before playing a video where Shwab is heard praising Trudeau for his dedication to the WEF agenda. In the clip, Shwab says that he is "proud" of the "young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau," as well as President of Argentina Mauricio Macri, and others.

- Posobiec detained at Davos World Economic Forum event

Imagine a white Roman Catholic college-dropout redneck comedian from New Jersey who straddles the political fence (supporting Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Ron Paul, and Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson at different times), yet who can sell his podcast rights for $100M after successfully fending off attacks by the woke left, and see the real cultural war in action.

Joseph James "Joe" Rogan (1967-) - Wiki bio.

Nawaz is living proof that the Huntington war has already been won by the West, and despite many pesky terrorist attacks, good old-fashioned world-conquering Islam is ultimately a blip in world history.

Born in Southend-on-Sea, Essex, to a British Pakistani family, Nawaz is a former member of the Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, an association that led to his December 2001 arrest in Egypt, where he remained imprisoned until 2006. Reading books on human rights and interacting with Amnesty International - who adopted him as a prisoner of conscience - resulted in a change of heart: he left Hizb-ut-Tahrir in 2007, renounced his Islamist past, and called for a "secular Islam".
- Maajid Usman Nawaz (1977-) - Wiki bio.

-------------------

The Great Reset Cancels U.S. The Great Reset Dominated by a Handful of Countries

Too bad, after seeing Vladimir Putin invade and destroy Ukraine without provocation, we would be smart to remember that Red China already kicked Uncle Sam's butt in Korea and Vietnam, and is busy ramping up its military for some reason, which very well might be invading and destroying the U.S. without provocation, this time flying U.N. peacekeeper banners, ostensibly to stop Naziism or white supremacy. It seems obvious to moi that each year they are planning for the big invasion simultaneously on all four coasts with help from Russia after the Chinese destroy all U.S. cities with hypersonic nuclear missiles. How convenient that after taking the soft underbelly of Mexico and splitting the U.S. into four or five isolated zones, the trapped pop. will likely find it hard to fight back with wind turbines and solar panels powering their EVs, and won't even have herds of cows to butcher for meat because the Greenies did their work. How long until the U.S. is canceled from history amid shouts of joy from the U.N. Gen. Assembly? Let's hope this is just a nightmare and never happens, but if it does, call me Ishmael.

-------------------

Did I mention global bankers? They’re stampeding to sell-out to ESG. To the Big Tech billionaires, money is just digital data that has no relation to any real blood, sweat, or tears, and can be digitally changed at will like presidential votes from Trump to Biden. In their Marxist utopia, no little people own anything, and… Didn’t I hear this before from Beatles man John Lennon?

Another participant railed against JPMorgan Chase’s management, saying they were pursuing "woke nonsense on the shareholder dime,” and demanded that they "stick to banking.”

It is clear that this is an issue of concern for JPMorgan, for another shareholder asked how much was spent on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance), and asked if such spending contributed to the "excessive expenses” that were reported by the bank last year. CEO Dimon responded, revealing JPMorgan Chase spent a staggering $106 billion on ESG initiatives last year.

- CFACT Confronts Energy Hypocrisy At JPMorgan Chase Shareholder Meeting, May 27, 2022

Top banking executive suspended 'for telling the truth' about global warming: Bolt (video)

HSBC’s head of responsible investing gave a presentation called, "Why investors need not worry about climate risk”, where he accused lawmakers of hyping up climate change as an existential crisis. He was suspended. What do you think? - by TLW

Back to the value of money. The global Marxists are already working on that, by making all money digital while outlawing the old kinds. This is so world-shaking that I'm still trying to wrap my mind around it.

Józef Retinger (1888-1960) Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (1911-2004)) Paul van Zeeland (1893-1973)) U.S. Gen. Charles Douglas Jackson (1902-64) George Wildman Ball of the U.S. (1909-94)

On May 29-31, 1954 in order to deal with growing anti-Americanism in W Europe, the Bilderberg Group (Conference) (Club) held its first annual closed invitation-only conference in the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek (4 mi. W of Arnhem), Netherlands of guests who were influential in politics, banking, the military and the media, with two from each nation, one conservative and one liberal, starting with 50 delegates from 11 W European countries and 11 Americans, eventually growing to 130 attendees; founders incl. Polish politician Jozef (Józef) Hieronim Retinger (1888-1960) (a Freemason rumored to be a grey eminence, who co-founded the EU), Dutch prince Bernhard (1911-2004), Belgian PM (1935-7) Paul Van Zeeland (1893-1973) (head of Unilever), and U.S. govt. psychological warfare expert (senior exec of Time mag.) Gen. Charles Douglas "C.D." Jackson (1902-64).; U.S. diplomat George Wildman Ball (1909-94) became an early U.S. member, attending every meeting.

2022: Learn where Bilderberg is meeting, what they're discussing, and what they're planning for you and yours (video)

2022: Global Elites Descend on DC for Bilderberg Meetings

2022: Bilderberg Elites Meet In Washington, D.C

Bilderberg 2022 Meet in Washington: Who Is There? (video)

-------------------

Maurice Strong (1929-2015) David Rockefeller (1915-2017)

Back to climate change and the history of its politicization.

The fake fear of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change became an issue after it was invented by billionaire globalists like David Rockefeller (1915-2017) and his Canadian protege Maurice Strong (1929-2015) (1988 founder of the U.N. IPCC) soon after starting the globalist organization, the Club of Rome in 1968. They knew that fear of death is a great motivator and that they could use this to scam the gullible public (i.e., the lowly "commoners") into accepting their draconian, extraordinarily expensive and extremely harmful changes to global economic, political and energy policies. This would allow these ultra-wealthy elitists to transfer even more of the world’s wealth to themselves and create their "utopian" one-world government with them in total control.

Don’t believe me? Read the Club of Rome's own words:

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill...humans need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose… Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time…Democracy has failed us, a new system of global governance… must be implemented quickly... A radical change from the current trajectory is required, a complete reordering of global society..." From their book The First Global Revolution.

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents ... to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economical institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine & other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." - David Rockefeller, oil billionaire, founder of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, co-founder of the globalist Trilateral Commission and co-founder of the globalist Club of Rome. - How did climate change become an issue? - John Walker

“What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides. Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
- Maurice Strong (1929-2015), 1990

In Aug. 1963-Mar. 1966 Pres. Kennedy allegedly ordered the top secret Iron Mountain Study by an anon. 15-person Special Study Group on how to bring the U.S. into a socialist New World Order, done in an underground nuclear bunker called Iron Mountain in N.Y. ; in 1967 The Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace was pub. by Dial Press, becoming a NYT bestseller; its secret govt. panel concluded that war or a credible substitute is necessary for govts. to maintain power; the jury is still out as to whether it's genuine or a hoax?

The Biden administration - and more importantly, their Obama 2.0 handlers (Jarrett, Holder, Powers, Rice) - are all-in on the use of the Climate Change narrative to supplant national sovereignty to the globalists of the World Economic Forum and the International Monetary Fund and World Bank through the US Federal Reserve, which I need to always state is not a government entity; the US Federal Reserve is not a government entity. It is a private entity operating with government authority; a fascist public-private partnership.

“That’s been the fascist Left’s long-term game plan ever since the turn of the 20th Century and especially since the 1967 Report from Iron Mountain which outlined a transition from managed wars to ‘climate change.’ In order to both continue the globalists’ financial manipulations of world economies and expand their control over the sovereign nations of the world they needed non-nation-state-inspired chaos to facilitate transition.

“The report came out in 1967 and, as a matter of note, the first ‘Ecology Day’ was ‘celebrated’ in 1970. The Ecology Movement, as you know, was the gateway to the climate movement of today, which the World Economic Forum and their associated globalist organization, i.e. the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and the full assortment of United Nations agencies, commissions, and organization is using to foment chaos to facilitate global governance.

“The Obama administration was at least ‘honest’ enough to have put into place operatives with deep commitments to achieving the ‘fundamental transformation of the United States of America’ through the destruction of sovereignty in deference to a globalized central government based on collectivism (read: 21st Century fascistic socialism). They did great damage and accelerated the movement started by the turn of the century ‘Progressives’ (read: Wilson & FDR), advancing the movement to being within scoring distance to the goal line.

“By contrast – and because the Obama 2.0 team is actually in control of the US federal government's Executive Branch, the Biden administration has placed morons and political opportunists in key spots. People like Gina McCarthy, Jennifer Granholm, John Kerry, Pete Buttigieg, etc. were promised cabinet positions to deliver votes from their specific demographics in the 2020 General Election. They are wholly unqualified to hold the positions they hold.

- The Manmade Climate Change Narrative & The Globalization Agenda

The Globalists Use of Climate Change As The New Chaos Creator

Margaret Mead (1901-78) George M. Woodwell (1930-) Paul Ralph Ehrlich (1932-) Stephen Henry Schneider (1945-) John Paul Holdren (1944-)

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

The global warming climate change scare has absolutely nothing to do with the environment or "Saving The Planet". Rather, its roots lie in a misanthropic agenda engineered by the environmental movement of the mid 1970’s, who realised that doing something about claimed man-made "global warming" would play to quite a number of the Left’s social agendas.

The goal was advanced, most notably, by The Club Of Rome (Environmental consultants to the UN) - group of mainly European scientists and academics, who used computer modeling to warn that the world would run out of finite resources if population growth were left unchecked.

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. the threat of global warming.. would fit the bill.. the real enemy, then, is humanity itself." – Club Of Rome

Thoughts on humanity:

"The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man." - The Club of Rome

The Club Of Rome’s 1972 environmental best-seller The Limits To Growth examined five variables in the original model: world population, industrialisation, pollution, food production and resource depletion.

NOT surprisingly, the study predicted a dire future for mankind unless we ‘act now’:

AROUND the same time, influential anthropologist and 1975 president of the American Medical Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Margaret Mead (1901-78) gathered together like-minded anti-population hoaxsters led by NCAR Boulder scientist William W. Kellogg at her 1975 North Carolina conference titled "The Atmosphere: Endangered and Endangering" - DRACONIAN UN CLIMATE AGENDA EXPOSED : ‘Global Warming Fears Are A Tool For Political and Economic Change…It Has Nothing To Do With The Actual Climate’

"Global Warming" is, and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world's population. The preposterous claim that human-produced carbon dioxide will broil the Earth, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life, came out of a 1975 conference in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, organized by the influential anthropologist Margaret Mead, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in 1974.

Mead - whose 1928 book on the sex life of South Pacific Islanders was later found to be a fraud - recruited like-minded anti-population hoaxsters to the cause: Sow enough fear of man-caused climate change to force global cutbacks in industrial activity and halt Third World development. Mead's leading recruits at the 1975 conference were climate-scare artist Stephen Henry Schneider (1945-2010), population-freak biologist George M. Woodwell (1930-), and the current AAAS president John Paul Holdren (1944-) - all three of them disciples of Malthusian fanatic Paul Ralph Ehrlich (1932-), author of The Population Bomb (1968). Guided by luminaries like these, conference discussion focussed on the absurd choice of either feeding people or "saving the environment." - 1975 `Endangered Atmosphere' Conference: Where the Global Warming Hoax Was Born

In the preface to the vol. containing the proceedings, Mead wrote that "responsible scientists" need to develop

"ways in which farsightedness can become a habit of the citizenry of the diverse peoples on the planet", and that "natural scientists need to develop ways of making their statements on the present danger credible to each other" in order to "make them credible to social scientists, politicians, and the citizenry", adding that the "time interval required before we begin to see clear evidence of a particular manmade effect on the environment may be long compared to the time in which society has to act." - The Anthropology of Climate Change: An Integrated Critical Perspective - Hans A. Baer and Merrill Singer, 2014

From my cool Climatescope:

S. Ichtiaque Rasool (1930-2016) James Edward Hansen (1941-) James Edward Hansen (1941-) Tim Worth of the U.S. (1939-) Al Gore of the U.S. (1948-)

On June 23, 1988 after the first Goddard Inst. for Space Studies (GISS) Global Temperature Analysis is pub. in 1981, and his mentor S. Ichtiaque Rasool (1930-2016) announces a new NASA CO2 research program, with the soundbyte: "No respectable scientist would say that you already have a signal", and foreign diplomats and environmental activists get U.S. Sen. (D-Colo.) (1987-93) Timothy Endicott "Tim" Wirth (1939-) to call it, profusely sweating top NASA Goddard climate scientist James Edward Hansen (1941-) addresses a U.S. Senate subcommitee chaired by U.S. Sen. (D-Tenn.) (1985-93) Albert Arnold "Al" Gore Jr. (1948-) in a hearing on a particularly hot day with malfunctioning air conditioning (after he and Wirth sabotaged it, with Wirth telling PBS-TV's "Frontline": "We called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer... so we scheduled the hearing that day, and bingo, it was the hottest day in Washington, or close to it... We went in at the night before and opened all the windows so that the air conditioning wasn't working inside the room"), uttering the soundbyte that "with 99% confidence" CO2-driven global warming has already arrived, claiming a 0.5C-0.7C global warming in the past cent., with the four warmest years all in the 1980s, and the two warmest in 1981 and 1987, making him 99% sure that the Earth is the warmest since instrumental data began to be collected in 1980, that there is a clear cause-effect relationship with the Greenhouse Effect, and that global warming is steadily increasing the likelihood of freak weather incl. superstorms, concluding: "Finally, I would like to stress that there is a need for improving these global climate models, and there is a need for global observations if we're going to obtain a full understanding of these phenomena", becoming "the opening salvo of the age of climate change", supercharging the One World Govt. (OWG) types and letting them loose like a roving lion to create a new money-hungry OWG religion complete with priests, bishops, and a pope (Al Gore)?, and CO2 as their Devil?; outside the hearing room Hansen declares "The greenhouse effect is here"; in 1999 the GISS study is updated, reporting 1998 as the warmest year on record despite slight cooling in the E U.S. and W Atlantic, mainly due to the El Nino; Hansen says that coal-fired power plants with no CO2 (carbon) capture technology should be eliminated in the U.S. by 2025, and the rest of the world by 2030; this despite the problem that carbon capture takes 3x-5x as much energy as can be gained by burning the fuel, which ultimately must come from burning fossil fuels, creating more CO2?; Hansen's runaway climate predictions focus the spotlight on the Petroleum (fossil fuel) industry and its Fossil fuels lobby, turning its great benefit to humanity into something sinister, based on pie-in-the-sky future gloom and doom predictions treated as sure things, targeting it with fossil fuel divestment, causing opponents of global warming to counter with global warming conspiracy theory; in the next seven years the budget for CO2-AGW climate research zooms from $200M to $4B?; too bad, after his runaway climate predictions fall flat, and he insists on keeping his job, on Aug. 29, 2000 Hansen et al. pub. the paper Global warming in the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario, admitting that the net global warming observed so far is likely due to non-CO2 gases and black carbon, because CO2 is offset by climate-cooling aerosols emitted via fossil fuel burning. On June 24, 1988 the article Global Warming Has Begun, Expert Tells Senate by Philip Shabecoff is pub. in the New York Times, containing the soundbyte: "Until now, scientists have been cautious about attributing rising global temperatures of recent years to the predicted global warming caused by pollutants in the atmosphere, known as the 'greenhouse effect.' But today Dr. James E. Hansen of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration told a Congressional committee that it was 99 percent certain that the warming trend was not a natural variation but was caused by a buildup of carbon dioxide and other artificial gases in the atmosphere. Dr. Hansen, a leading expert on climate change, said in an interview that there was no 'magic number' that showed when the greenhouse effect was actually starting to cause changes in climate and weather. But he added, 'It is time to stop waffling so much and say that the evidence is pretty strong that the greenhouse effect is here.'" On Sept. 25, 2006 Hansen et al. pub. the paper Global Temperature Change in Proceedings of the Nat. Academy of Sciences, with the abstract: "Global surface temperature has increased 0.2°C per decade in the past 30 years, similar to the warming rate predicted in the 1980s initial global climate model simulations with transient greenhouse gas changes. Warming is larger in the Western Equatorial Pacific than in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific over the past century, and we suggest that the increased West–East temperature gradient may have increased the likelihood of strong El Niños, such as those of 1983 and 1998. Comparison of measured sea surface temperatures in the Western Paci?c with paleoclimate data suggests that this critical ocean region, and probably the planet as a whole, is approximately as warm now as at the Holocene maximum and within 1°C of the maximum temperature of the past million years. We conclude that global warming of more than 1°C, relative to 2000, will constitute 'dangerous' climate change as judged from likely effects on sea level and extermination of species" - is 1C of global avg. temp change like a $3 bill? On Dec. 5, 2006 Hansen et al. pub. the paper Dangerous human-made interference withclimate: a GISS modelE study in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, using the GISS climate data with computer climate simulations to predict the future, with the conclusion: "Our conclusion that global temperature is nearing the level of dangerous climate effects implies that little time remains to achieve the international cooperation needed toavoid widespread undesirable consequences. CO2 emissions are the critical issue, because a substantial fraction of these emissions remain in the atmosphere 'forever, for practical purposes. The principal implication is that avoidance of dangerous climate change requires the bulk of coal and unconventional fossil fuel resources to be exploited only under condition that CO2 emissions are captured and sequestered. A second inference is that remaining gas and oil resources must be husbanded, so thattheir role in critical functions such as mobile fuels can be stretched until acceptable alternatives are available, thus avoiding a need to squeeze such fuels from unconventional and environmentally damaging sources. The task is to achieve a transition toclean carbon-free energy sources, which are essential on the long run, without push-ing the climate system beyond a level where disastrous irreversible effects become inevitable." In 2008 Hansen et al. pub. the paper Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim? in The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, accepting on all the worst climate Armageddon predictions on the market and concluding that atmospheric CO2 must be reduced to 350 ppm or lower by putting "a rising global price on CO2 emissions" and phasing out coal use unless CO2 is captured and sequestered. On Feb. 13, 2013 global warming scientist James A. Hansen of NASA is arrested outside the White House along with Sierra Club dir. Michael Brune, 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, civil rights activist Julian Bond, and actress Daryl Hannah while protesting the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline. CLIMATE WISDOM FROM The FATheR OF CLIMATE CHANGE Watch video - James Hansen. Watch video - James Hansen. Watch video - Tony Heller on James Hansen. Watch video - Tony Heller on James Hansen.

Ever since its 1988 founding, the global Marxist politician-run U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has had one single-minded goal, namely, to frame CO2 emissions as threatening runaway global warming if they're not stopped ASAP. Atmospheric science was hijacked by them to create the bastard fake field of "climate science", which allows extreme leftist anti-fossil fuel activists to masquerade as scientists to push the IPCC agenda.

PM Margaret Thatcher of Britain (1925-2013)

On Nov. 8, 1989 chemistry-trained British Conservative PM (1979-90) Margaret Hilda Thatcher (nee Roberts) (1925-2013) (AKA the Iron Lady) gives her 1989 Speech on Climate Change to the U.N. Gen. Assembly, warning of the dangers of rising CO2 and calling for an internat. framework convention on climate change, with the aim being "to prevent rather than just cure a global environmental problem", abandoning her laissez-faire free market principles with the soundbyte that economic growth must benefit "future as well as present generations everywhere", becoming the first world leader to put climate change at the top of the global agenda; it contains the soundbytes: "I believe we should aim to have a convention on global climate change ready by the time the World Conference on Environment and Development meets in 1992. That will be among the most important conferences the United Nations has ever held. I hope that we shall all accept a responsibility to meet this timetable. The 1992 Conference is indeed already being discussed among many countries in many places. And I draw particular attention to the very valuable discussion which members of the Commonwealth had under the Mahathir bin Mohamad, Prime Minister of Malaysia's chairmanship at our recent Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Kuala Lumpur. But a framework is not enough. It will need to be filled out with specific undertakings, or protocols in diplomatic language, on the different aspects of climate change. These protocols must be binding and there must be effective regimes to supervise and monitor their application. Otherwise those nations which accept and abide by environmental agreements, thus adding to their industrial costs, will lose out competitively to those who do not. The negotiation of some of these protocols will undoubtedly be difficult. And no issue will be more contentious than the need to control emissions of carbon dioxide, the major contributor—apart from water vapour—to the greenhouse effect. We can't just do nothing. But the measures we take must be based on sound scientific analysis of the effect of the different gases and the ways in which these can be reduced. In the past there has been a tendency to solve one problem at the expense of making others worse. The United Kingdom therefore proposes that we prolong the role of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change after it submits its report next year, so that it can provide an authoritative scientific base for the negotiation of this and other protocols. We can then agree to targets to reduce the greenhouse gases, and how much individual countries should contribute to their achievement. We think it important that this should be done in a way which enables all our economies to continue to grow and develop. The challenge for our negotiators on matters like this is as great as for any disarmament treaty. The Inter-governmental Panel's work mustremain on target, and we must not allow ourselves to be diverted into fruitless and divisive argument. Time is too short for that." On Nov. 6, 1990 Thatcher follows with another 1990 Speech on Climate Change, which contains the soundbytes: "The IPCC report is a remarkable achievement. It is almost as difficult to get a large number of distinguished scientists to agree, as it is to get agreement from a group of politicians. As a scientist who became a politician, I am perhaps particularly qualified to make that observation! I know both worlds. Of course, much more research is needed. We don't yet know all the answers. Some major uncertainties and doubts remain. No-one can yet say with certainty that it is human activities which have caused the apparent increase in global average temperatures. The IPCC report is very careful on this point. For instance, the total amount of carbon dioxide reaching the atmosphere each year from natural sources is some 600 billion tonnes, while the figure resulting from human activities is only 26 billion tonnes. In relative terms that is not very significant. Equally we know that the increases of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere date from the start of the industrial revolution. And we know that those concentrations will continue to rise if we fail to act. Nor do we know with any precision the extent of the likely warming in the next century, nor what the regional effects will be, and we can't be sure of the role of the clouds. There is a continuing mystery about how atmospheric carbon, including the small extra contribution from human sources, continuing mystery about how that is being absorbed: is most of it going into the ocean, as used to be thought? Or is it being increasingly absorbed by trees or plants, of soils, especially in the northern hemisphere? These are questions that need answers, sooner rather than later. Global climate change within limits need not by itself pose serious problems—our globe has after all seen a great deal of climate change over the centuries. And it's notable that the blue-green algae which dominated the Precambrian period at the dawn of life are still major components of the marine phytoplankton today. Despite the climate changes of many millions of years, these microbes have persisted on earth virtually unchanged, pumping out life-giving oxygen into the atmosphere and mopping up carbon dioxide. The real dangers arise because climate change is combined with other problems of our age: for instance the population explosion; — the deterioration of soil fertility; — increasing pollution of the sea; — intensive use of fossil fuel; — and destruction of the world's forests, particularly those in the tropics." In 2002 Thatcher flip-flops in her autobio. Statecraft: Strategies for a Changing World, which contains the soundbytes: "By the end of my time as Prime Minister I was also becoming seriously concerned about the anti-capitalist arguments which the campaigners against global warming were deploying"; "The doomsters' favourite subject today is climate change. Clearly no plan to alter climate could be considered on anything but a global scale, it provides a marvellous excuse for worldwide, supra-national socialism"; "Actually, President Bush was quite right to reject the Kyoto protocol... Kyoto was an anti-growth, anti-capitalist, anti-American project which no American leader alert to his country's national interests could have supported." Watch video.

Much of the scary climate stuff gleefully trumpeted by the global media comes from the U.N.’s IPCC, a highly politicized organization that doesn’t actually carry out any original climate research. Instead, it simply issues assessments based upon supposedly independent surveys of published research. However some of its most influential conclusions that are summarized in its reports have neither been based upon truly independent research, nor properly vetted through accepted peer-review processes.

One example is a 1996 IPCC report that used selective data, doctored graphs, and featured changes in text made after the reviewing scientists approved it and before it was printed. The many irregularities provoked Dr. Frederick Seitz, a world-famous physicist and former president of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the American Physical Society, and Rockefeller University to write in the Wall Street Journal: "I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process than events that led to this IPCC report."

IPCC Summary for Policymakers reports offer prescriptions for distribution of wealth and resource redistribution, including regionalized (smaller) economies to reduce transportation demand, reorienting lifestyles away from consumption, resource- sharing through co-ownership, and encouraging citizens to pursue free time over wealth.

While there can be no doubt that manufactured climate crisis drives multi-billion dollar science and EPA energy regulatory industries, the U.N. has far more ambitious goals. As Christine Stewart, then Canadian Minister of the Environment, speaking before editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald in 1998, said, "No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world."- The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History Lesson

The U.N. And Its Staggering Rise In Dishonesty

Soros’ Sophistry & The Fight For A New Economic Science

Economic growth is bad for the climate, Europe’s Science Academies claim

From my cool Climatescope:

Maurice Strong of Canada (1929-2015) Tim Wirth of the U.S. (1939-) Severn Cullis-Suzuki (1979-)

On June 3-14, 1992 the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit (U.N. Conference on Environment and Development) is held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, producing the 27-principle Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, based on the principle of sustainable development, a Rio Declaration on Forests, the Rio (U.N.) Framework Convention on Climate Change (June 4), and the devilish Marxist globalist 40-chapter $600B Agenda 21 along with an agreement to establish a Sustainable Development Commission to monitor the progress in implementing the Rio Declaration, becoming the largest and most costly diplomatic gathering in world history to date but failing to agree on an internat. ban on whaling, followed on June 13-22 by the U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development, in which Canadian globalist Marxist U.N. bigwig Maurice Strong (1929-2015) utters the soundbytes: "We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?"; "It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class…involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, ownership of motor vehicles, golf courses, small electric appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable... A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns", followed by U.S. Sen. (D-Colo.) (1987-93) Timothy Endicott "Tim" Wirth (1939-) (backer of Al Gore's agenda), who utters the soundbyte: "We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy", going on to become undersecy. of state #1 for global affairs for the U.S. State Dept. in 1993-7, lead U.S. negotiator for the Kyoto Climate Conference, and pres. #1 of the United Nations Foundation in 1998-2013; activists claim that the Earth has only 10 years left to get global warming under control; U.S. deputy asst. of state Richard Benedick adds: "A global warming treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect"; Vancouver, Canada-born environmental activist Severn Cullis-Suzuki (1979-), daughter of environmental activist David Suzuki and 1988 founder of the Environmental Children's Org. (ECO) gives a speech at the Rio summit, containing the soundbyte: "I am afraid to go out in the sun now because of the hole in our ozone. I am afraid to breathe the air because I don't know what chemicals are in it", which becomes a viral YouTube hit, causing her to be known as "the Girl Who Silenced the World for Five Minutes"; in 2002 she founds the Internet-based think tank The Skyfish Project; meanwhile a climate skeptic conference is held in Heidelberg, Germany, resulting in the Heidelberg Appeal by Michel Salomon to be pub., signed by 492 scientists, calling on govt. to quit following "junk" environmental science for their "balanced" policies, calling it "pseudoscientific arguments or false and nonrelevant data", pissing-off the global warmists, who call it tobacco and asbestos industry agitprop, which doesn't stop it from having influence, after which Philip Morris pays APCO & Assocs. the create the Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (TASSC) in 1993, headed by Steve Milloy. In Dec. 2011 U.N. Foundation pres. Tim Wirth utters the soundbyte that Pres. Obama has a "last window of opportunity" to put in place dramatic carbon dioxide restrictions necessary to keep future warming "anywhere approaching" the 2 degree Celsius tipping point and avert catastrophic climate change, but "I don't know who and where the climate leadership in the administration is. It doesn't exist. There is no resolve in the Obama administration to do anything, and I think they look at Congress and say, 'We can't do anything, so why break our pick now?'" Watch video - Severn Suzuki. Watch video - Glenn Beck and Rosa Koire. Watch video - Glenn Beck and Rosa Koire. Watch video - Patrick Wood.

On June 4, 1992 the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is opened for signatures at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, entering into force on Mar. 21, 1994, with the objective to "stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system", setting non-binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions with no enforcement mechanisms.

Global Marxist Psychos Global Marxist Money

The overwhelming success of the IPCC CO2-caused global warming hoax has helped their multi-trillion-dollar Great Train Robbery speed down the tracks toward the goal of sucking up all the money in the world, not because it can change Earth's climate, but to foist a global Marxist police state with the former world policeman U.S. canceled, their impossible dream. They are now even talking about a world law making any country who doesn't go with their program suffer criminal penalties.

Consulting firm McKinsey estimates $9 trillion per year cost for climate accords

China & India need $50 trillion for Net-Zero transition, report says

Biden: ‘My Administration Has Launched the Most Ambitious Environmental and Climate Agenda in History’

"Woke” investors are putting American national security at risk with their anti-fossil fuel gambits

From my cool Climatescope:

Arthur B. Robinson (1942-) Frederick Seitz (1911-2008)

On Dec. 11, 1997 the Kyoto Protocol is signed by 192 parties incl. all U.N. member states except Andorra, Canada, South Sudan, and the U.S., effective Feb. 16, 2005, extending the 1992 U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) committing all parties to reduce greenhouse emissions esp. CO2, while giving a pass to India and Red China; opening remarks offered by FCCC’s Environment Program Executive Director Maurice Strong who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil expressed an underlying priority very candidly: "We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?"; "Strong left no doubt about where to place blame for global problems, stating in the conference report: "It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class… involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, ownership of motor vehicles, golf courses, small electric appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable…A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns"; former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S undersecretary of state for global issues, joined Maurice Strong in addressing the Climate Summit audience he said: "We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy." (Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.); also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick, who then headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department, agreed that the Kyoto Protocol should be approved whether it had anything to do with climate change or not: "A global warming treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect"; in 1998 the Oregon Petition AKA the Global Warming Petition Project, organized by Chicago, Ill.-born biochemist Arthur Brouhard "Art" Robinson (1942-), pres. of the Ore. Inst. of Science and Medicine in Cave Junction, Ore. (founded in 1980), and endorsed by Am. solid state physicist Frederick Seitz (1911-2008), pres. #17 of the U.S. Nat Academy of Sciences in 1962-9 is launched, and signed by 31,487 Am. scientists incl. 9,029 with doctorates by Oct. 2019, urging the U.S. to reject the Kyoto Protocol, with the soundbytes: "This treaty is, in our opinion, based upon flawed ideas. Research data on climate change do not show that human use of hydrocarbons is harmful. To the contrary, there is good evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful"; "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth"; "The proposed agreement would have very negative effects upon the technology of nations around the world, especially those that are currently attempting to lift from poverty and provide opportunities to over 4 billion people in technologically undeveloped countries"; "The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind"; the U.S. Congress unanimously agrees with the advice, while the EU continues to back the Kyoto Protocol.

From my cool Climatescope:

Rod Serling on Climate Change Hockey Stick Graph Michael E. Mann (1965-) Willie Soon (1966-) Sallie Baliunas (1953-) Chris de Freitas (1948-2017)

Man-made global warming or Mann-made global warming? On Apr. 23, 1998 Am. climatologists Michael Evan Mann (1965-) (Penn. State U.), Raymond S. "Ray" Bradley, and Malcolm K. Hughes pub. the article Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries in Nature, proposing the Hockey Stick Graph based on reconstructions of the temp record on Earth over the past 600 (later 1K years), showing an abrupt rise in temps over the last 150 years, ramping up the Global Warming Controversy over whether there is a coming runaway heat wave; Mann had a newly-minted doctorate that was "rushed through" so he could be appointed lead scientist of the IPCC?; In Nov. 2019 Phil Jones, dir. of the U. of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit receives a British Freedom of Info. Act requesting documentary proof of human-caused global warming, which he refuses to provide, after which a secret whistleblower leaks a treasure trove of secret emails to the realclimate.org Web site, who refuse to publish it, after which they send it to Anthony Watts, who publicizes it; Mann's graph hides the Medieval Warm Period of 950-1250, and later Mann and Katherine Hayhoe work together to erase it from history to make modern times look exceptional?; on Jan. 31, 2003 Malaysian-born Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics aerospace engineer Wei-Hock "Willie" Soon (1966-) and Harvard-Smithsonian astrophysicist Sallie Louise Baliunas (1953-) pub. the paper Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years in Climate Research, blasting Mann's hockey stick, with the soundbytes: "Our results suggest a different interpretation of the multiproxy climates compared to recent conclusions of Mann et al. (1998, 1999, 2000)", "Our current lack of understanding of the Earth's climate system does not allow us to determine reliably the magnitude of climate change that will be caused by anthropogenic CO2 emissions, let alone whether this change will be for better or for worse", and "Across the world, many records reveal that the 20th century is probably not the warmest or a uniquely extreme climatic period of the last millennium", which is quickly adopted by the Pres. G.W. Bush admin. as a basis for amending the first EPA Report on the Environment, causing a firestorm of controversy causing 10 of 20 editors to resign and German-born publisher Otto Kinne (1923-2015) to cut the authors loose and blame the ed. who passed the paper, Trinidad and Tobago-born Kiwi climate scientist Christopher Rhodes "Chris" de Freitas (1948-2017), who on May 9, 2006 pub. an article in the New Zealand Herald with the soundbyte: "There is evidence of global warming. The climate has warmed about 0.6 °C in the past 100 years, but most of that warming occurred prior to 1940, before the post World War II industrialisation that led to an increase in carbon dioxide emissions. But warming does not confirm that carbon dioxide is causing it. Climate is always warming or cooling. There are natural variability theories of warming"; de Freitas also writes the soundbytes: "I am not a global warming skeptic. I accept that rising human-caused CO2 from fossil sources could 'change the climate'. The basic physics is there to support this view. But where is the evidence that the putative change would be large or damaging?" and "Climate is not responding to greenhouse gases in the way we thought it might. If increasing carbon dioxide is in fact increasing climate change, its impact is smaller than natural variation. People are being misled by people making money out of this"; Mann tries to cover up tree ring proxy data calculations by Keith Briffa at the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the U. of East Anglia that showed a steady temperature decline?; Mann covered up an r-squared statistical test that showed his hockey stick shape to be incorrect?; no surprise, Mann suggests that Harvard U. punish Soon and Baliunas; on June 5, 2001 Baliunas pub. the paper Climate History and the Sun, containing the soundbyte: "But is it possible that the particular temperature increase observed in the last 100 years is the result of carbon dioxide produced by human activities? The scientific evidence clearly indicates that this is not the case … measurements of atmospheric temperatures made by instruments lofted in satellites and balloons show that no warming has occurred in the atmosphere in the last 50 years. This is just the period in which humanmade carbon dioxide has been pouring into the atmosphere and according to the climate studies, the resultant atmospheric warming should be clearly evident." On Jan. 31, 2003 Soon and Baliunas pub. the paper Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 2000 years in Climate Research, with the abstract: "The 1000 yr climatic and environmental history of the Earth contained in various proxy records is reviewed. As indicators, the proxies duly represent local climate. Because each is of a different nature, the results from the proxy indicators cannot be combined into a hemispheric or global quantitative composite. However, considered as an ensemble of individual expert opinions, the assemblage of local representations of climate establishes both the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period as climatic anomalies with worldwide imprints, extending earlier results by Bryson et al. (1963), Lamb (1965), and numerous intervening research efforts. Furthermore, the individual proxies can be used to address the question of whether the 20th century is the warmest of the 2nd millennium locally. Across the world, many records reveal that the 20th century is probably not the warmest nor a uniquely extreme climatic period of the last millennium", which they follow with the Mar. 31, 2003 press release 20th Century Climate Not So Hot, which starts out: "A review of more than 200 climate studies led by researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics has determined that the 20th century is neither the warmest century nor the century with the most extreme weather of the past 1000 years. The review also confirmed that the Medieval Warm Period of 800 to 1300 A.D. and the Little Ice Age of 1300 to 1900 A.D. were worldwide phenomena not limited to the European and North American continents. While 20th century temperatures are much higher than in the Little Ice Age period, many parts of the world show the medieval warmth to be greater than that of the 20th century", pissing-off the IPCC crowd and resulting in the Soon and Baliunas Controversy. On May 9, 2003 Baliunas speaks out against U.K. climate change policy, with the soundbyte: "Fear often dominates discussion about the earth's climate. Many people have been led to believe that drastic measures are necessary to prevent the risk of negative future outcomes, such as global warming. As such, we now face a situation where politicians are misallocating resources because they are responding to manufactured problems, which are based on public anxiety rather than sound scientific evidence. Ineffective measures like the Kyoto Protocol, built on fear rather than science, will not reduce the future burden of greenhouse gases and will cause many more problems than they solve." On Nov. 14, 2011 Baliunas pub. the press release Human Activity is Not Cause of Global Warming via the George C. Marshall Inst., containing the soundbyte: "The science does not suggest dangerous global warming. If there is any trace at all of a greenhouse warming, it is too small to be seen in the climate record. That means that future warming due to human activities will be quite small - well under one degree C." On Feb. 25, 2015 after Soon is named a creditor in bankruptcy filings of Peabody Energy, Canadian mathematician Christopher Essex pub. the article Save Willie: The global warming movement is anti-science, oblivious to how little we know about climate in the Financial Post, calling out the "fascistic" media for "silly hit pieces" on Soon, with the soundbyte: "Those that speak out must endure vexatious, eristic tactics rather than scientific reasoning in matters from publication, to funding, to jobs. For example, my friend Dr. Willie Soon is under assault from activist groups. An army of human bots has been released to get him fired from Harvard's Center for Astrophysics. He's shared scientist's skepticism publicly. Betraying acute ignorance, media pound him with silly hit pieces. Some perpetrators believe they fight for science, but they could not be more antiscientific, if not fascistic. If there''s any chance at a rational policy on climate, two things must happen. First, intelligent laymen must take back the debate, by pushing currently out-of-bounds science back onto center stage. They must stop letting 'experts' do their thinking for them. Second, political attacks on scientists must be stopped. Those must be pushed out of bounds. Let's begin by saving Willie!" In Nov. 2015 Soon, Irish chemist Ronan Connolly, and his environmentalist father Michael Connolly pub. the paper Re-evaluating the role of solar variability on Northern Hemisphere temperature trends since the 19th century in Earth-Science Reviews, with the soundbyte: "Finally, we compare our new composite to one of the solar variability datasets not considered by the CMIP5 climate models, i.e., Scafetta and Willson, 2014's update to the Hoyt and Schatten, 1993 dataset. A strong correlation is found between these two datasets, implying that solar variability has been the dominant influence on Northern Hemisphere temperature trends since at least 1881." On Sept. 27, 2016 Mann pub. The Madhouse Effect: How Climate Change Denial Is Threatening Our Planet, Destroying Our Politics, and Driving Us Crazy. On Aug. 1, 2019 The Washington Post pub. the article Why we shouldn't take peer review as the 'gold standard', trying to attack peer review itself as to be chucked if climate skeptics like fossil fuel-funded Willie Soon are permitted to publish, drawing a scornful open letter by Christopher Monckton. On Sept. 10, 2020 the state of Del. libels Soon, calling him corrupted. On Oct. 2, 2020 Mann gives an interview to the Guardian, uttering the soundbytes: "A second Trump term is game over for the climate - really!"; "If we are going to avert ever more catastrophic climate change impacts, we need to limit warming below a degree and a half Celsius, a little less than three degrees Fahrenheit. Another four years of what we've seen under Trump, which is to outsource environmental and energy policy to the polluters and dismantle protections put in place by the previous administration... would make that essentially impossible"; "It is a political statement, because it speaks to the need to enact policies to deal with climate change. But it isn't partisan to say that we should act on this crisis"; "It's also a scientific statement. Two years ago this month, scientists with the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published a landmark study, Global Warming of 1.5 Degrees, which found that humanity had to cut heat-trapping emissions roughly by half by 2030 to avoid catastrophic climate breakdown"; headlines warned we had '12 years to save the planet"; in Nov. 2020 Joe Biden picks Mann to be his climate advisor. Crooked Climate ‘Scientist' Michael Mann Caught Lying Again! - John Sullivan. Watch video - Michael E. Mann. Watch video - Michael E. Mann. Watch video - Michael E. Mann. Watch video - Michael E. Mann. Watch video - Michael E. Mann. Watch video - Michael E. Mann et al.. Watch video - Sally Baliunas. Watch video - Sally Baliunas. Watch video - Willie Soon. Watch video - Willie Soon. Watch video - Willie Soon. Watch video - Willie Soon. Watch video - Willie Soon. Watch video - Willie Soon. Watch video - Malcolm Roberts. Watch video - Tony Heller. Watch video - Tony Heller. Watch video - Tony Heller. Watch video - Alex Epstein.

The 2020 COVID-19 global plague gave a giant boost to global Marxists, who for awhile thought that it killed capitalism permanently as they gleefully shut it down with a power network that they spent years building. Too bad, capitalism made a quick return the moment they let people out of their cages:

Leftist robber baron college dropout billionaire Hell Gates, er, Bill Gates poses himself as an expert on vaccines. Since he's suspected of being a Malthusian, no wonder people suspect his motives:

What Does The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Releasing Genetically Modified Mosquitoes, CRISPR & The World Economic Forum's 4th Industrial Revolution Have In Common Something very strange is going on and ‘health experts’ are baffled: Monkeypox was weaponized in the deep state’s Ukraine labs, another sign the depopulation agenda is in full swing

Klaus Schwab lays it out in writing in his June 3, 2020 essay Now is the time for a 'great reset':

COVID-19 lockdowns may be gradually easing, but anxiety about the world’s social and economic prospects is only intensifying. There is good reason to worry: a sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But, while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable.

To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a "Great Reset" of capitalism.

There are many reasons to pursue a Great Reset, but the most urgent is COVID-19. Having already led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, the pandemic represents one of the worst public-health crises in recent history. And, with casualties still mounting in many parts of the world, it is far from over.

This will have serious long-term consequences for economic growth, public debt, employment, and human wellbeing. According to the Financial Times, global government debt has already reached its highest level in peacetime. Moreover, unemployment is skyrocketing in many countries: in the US, for example, one in four workers have filed for unemployment since mid-March, with new weekly claims far above historic highs. The International Monetary Fund expects the world economy to shrink by 3% this year - a downgrade of 6.3 percentage points in just four months.

All of this will exacerbate the climate and social crises that were already underway. Some countries have already used the COVID-19 crisis as an excuse to weaken environmental protections and enforcement. And frustrations over social ills like rising inequality - US billionaires’ combined wealth has increased during the crisis –-are intensifying.

Left unaddressed, these crises, together with COVID-19, will deepen and leave the world even less sustainable, less equal, and more fragile. Incremental measures and ad hoc fixes will not suffice to prevent this scenario. We must build entirely new foundations for our economic and social systems.

The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is unprecedented. But it is not some impossible dream. In fact, one silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly we can make radical changes to our lifestyles. Almost instantly, the crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to working in an office.

Likewise, populations have overwhelmingly shown a willingness to make sacrifices for the sake of health-care and other essential workers and vulnerable populations, such as the elderly. And many companies have stepped up to support their workers, customers, and local communities, in a shift toward the kind of stakeholder capitalism to which they had previously paid lip service.

Clearly, the will to build a better society does exist. We must use it to secure the Great Reset that we so badly need. That will require stronger and more effective governments, though this does not imply an ideological push for bigger ones. And it will demand private-sector engagement every step of the way.

The Great Reset agenda would have three main components. The first would steer the market toward fairer outcomes. To this end, governments should improve coordination (for example, in tax, regulatory, and fiscal policy), upgrade trade arrangements, and create the conditions for a "stakeholder economy." At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action.

Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.

The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability. Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are i mplementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ($826 billion) recovery fund. The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans.

Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building "green" urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.

The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges. During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centers; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.

The COVID-19 crisis is affecting every facet of people’s lives in every corner of the world. But tragedy need not be its only legacy. On the contrary, the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future. - What Is the Great Reset?

Maurice Strong and the Roots of the Great Reset Agenda

The Green Agenda: Club of Rome – Club of Budapest – Club of Madrid

Climate Activism Against Capitalism and Eternal Economic Growth

What is the Great Reset and What do the Globalists Actually Want?

Global Warming A Back Door To Socialism - And Now Even The UN Admits It

Watch: Morano on TV explains how climate agenda is pushing 'the end of private car ownership' & end of meat-eating

Net-Zero 'Green' Reset Designed to Destroy Our Reliable & Affordable Power Supplies

WEF elites: countries must reject sovereign interests and prioritize ‘global agenda’

Soros, Club of Rome Pushing Global Equity

"Systemic climate racism". Who knew?

Sustainable Development is the action plan to impose Agenda 21 policies. In reality it is a trigger word designed to get you to voluntarily surrender your liberties.

To fully understand what a massive threat this is to everything in your life, the very best description of Sustainable Development was provided by one of its most powerful opponents - The recently deceased Rosa Kori, of Democrats Against Agenda 21. She said, “UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all information, all energy, and all human beings in the world.” INVENTORY AND CONTROL!

Every time you hear the word SUSTAINABLE understand that it has nothing to do with protecting the environment - it’s the actual blueprint to subvert current governments to global control. And so, with Agenda 21, they were on their way toward the goals to reorganize human society.

- The Great Reset: Will You Submit Or Stop It?

As the "science" behind man-made global warming has been increasingly discredited, the story has changed. Now it’s not about saving the environment but about redistributing wealth, says a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ottmar Edenhofer, a co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group III and a lead author of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report, 2007 (its latest), recently said, "One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."

Edenhofer told a German news outlet (NZZ AM Sonntag): "Basically, it’s a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War."

"First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community," said Edenhofer. Thus the developers of coal and oil should pay reparations in the form of global carbon emission rights and taxes. Investors Business Daily commented "U.N. Warm-mongers are seeking to impose a global climate reparations tax on everything from airline flights and international shipping, to fuel and financial transactions."

The Cancun agreement set up a "Green Climate Fund" to administer assistance to poor nations suffering from floods and drought due to global warming. The European Union, Japan and the United States have led pledges of $100 billion per year for poor nations up to 2020, plus $30 billion in immediate assistance.

The agreement says it "recognizes that deep cuts in global greenhouse gas emissions are required according to science" and calls for "urgent action" to cap temperature rises. But this chart gives lie to such claims. You can clearly see that on a multimillion-year scale global temperatures have been confined to a steady band unrelated to even huge changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Does this graph reveal any need for "urgent action" "according to science?" Yet at the Cancun conference, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon warned, "Nature will not wait….Science warns that the window of opportunity to prevent uncontrolled climate change will soon close."

The window of opportunity that is going to close is not a scientific one but a political one - because more and more people are realizing that global warming alarmism is based on phony science and outright lies.

Foremost in the struggle to bring essential scientific truths to light on this issue is the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) founded and directed by the distinguished atmospheric physicist S. Fred Singer. With assistance from climate experts in 16 countries - who donated their time and efforts—the NIPCC produced a massive, extensively-illustrated 880-page report "out of concern that the IPCC was provoking irrational fear of anthropogenic global warming," in the words of Dr. Singer. The report references 4,000 (!) research papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals that contradict IPCC conclusions but were not used by the IPCC though it claims to be the definitive source of climate research. The entire report can be downloaded free from the Heartland Institute website.

I shall discuss only one item from the NIPCC report, but it is fundamental to the whole carbon dioxide/greenhouse hypothesis of global warming. Worldwide, there are 20-some GCMs (General Circulation Models) for computer modeling of global climate change. They all agree—for sound theoretical reasons—that greenhouse gases cannot warm the earth directly. They must first warm the atmosphere, which in turn warms the surface of the earth. So the atmosphere must be warmer than the earth’s surface. The NIPCC Summary Report explains: "Climate models all predict that, if GH gases are driving climate change, there will be a unique fingerprint in the form of a warming trend increasing with altitude in the tropical troposphere, the region of the atmosphere up to about 15 kilometers. Climate changes due to solar variability or other known natural factors will not yield this characteristic pattern; only sustained greenhouse warming will do so." The models show this "hot spot" perfectly—but it is missing in actual observations, which show instead this area to be cooler than the earth’s surface. The Summary Report states—in boldface type: "This mismatch of observed and calculated fingerprints clearly falsifies the hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming." The Summary Report also notes, "The IPCC has been disingenuous about solar influences on the climate…. The demonstration of solar influence on climate is now overwhelming….There now is little doubt that solar-wind variability is a primary cause of climate change on a decadal time scale."

The disclosure of thousands of emails from climate scientists in November 2009 became known as the "climategate" scandal. It raised concerns about the validity of global warming predictions and the integrity and professional misconduct of some of the world’s leading climate scientists. But even before "climategate," some important scientists tried to alert the public to the unscientific nature of IPCC procedures and conclusions. These scientists were generally derided as "deniers" by the news media and opinion makers.

The IPCC regularly submits its reports to its Expert Reviewers Panel. As you might expect, most of its appointments to this panel have been supporters of global warming. A few nonbelievers have been included to give the appearance of balance, but their comments and questions have been routinely ignored as the IPCC focuses on what it claims to be the "consensus" view.

Only one person has been been on every IPCC Expert Reviewers Panel. That man is Dr. Vincent Gray. He submitted a very large number of comments to IPCC drafts, including 1,898 for the Final Draft of the 2007 Report. Here are some of his comments from a letter he wrote on March 9, 2008:

"Over the period I have made an intensive study of the data and procedures used by IPCC contributors throughout their whole study range…. Right from the beginning I have had difficulty with this procedure. Penetrating questions often ended without any answer. Comments on the IPCC drafts were rejected without explanation, and attempts to pursue the matter were frustrated indefinitely. Over the years, as I have learned more about the data and procedures of the IPCC I have found increasing opposition by them to providing explanations, until I have been forced to the conclusion that for significant parts of the work of the IPCC, the data collection and scientific methods employed are unsound. Resistance to all efforts to try and discuss or rectify these problems has convinced me that normal scientific procedures are not only rejected by the IPCC, but that this practice is endemic, and was part of the organization from the very beginning. I therefore consider that the IPCC is fundamentally corrupt. The only "reform" I could envisage, would be its abolition. [The] flagship set of data promoted by the IPCC are the figures showing the increase in atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide. They have manipulated the data in such a way to persuade us (including most scientists) that this concentration is constant throughout the atmosphere.

The models are so full of inaccurately known parameters and equations that it is comparatively easy to "fudge" an approximate fit to the few climate sequences that might respond. This sort of evidence is the main feature of most of the current promotional lectures.

By drawing attention to these obvious facts I have now found myself persona non grata with most of my local professional associations, Surely, I am questioning the integrity of these award-winning scientific leaders of the local science establishment. When you get down to it, that is what is involved…. Yes, we have to face it. The whole process is a swindle. The IPCC from the beginning was given the license to use whatever methods would be necessary to provide "evidence" that carbon dioxide increases are harming the climate, even if this involves manipulation of dubious data and using peoples’ opinions instead of science to "prove" their case.

The disappearance of the IPCC in disgrace is not only desirable but inevitable…. Sooner or later all of us will come to realize that this organization, and the thinking behind it, is phony. Unfortunately severe economic damage is likely to be done by its influence before that happens."

The funny thing today is the masses of closed-minded brainwashed leftist zombies who call the truth about the Great Reset a right-wing conspiracy theory, when it’s now an open fact and there’s no point in lying any more. With global Marxists allied to leftist Internet capitalist billionaires, there’s no longer any left-wing or right-wing because they want the whole bird.

QUESTION: Where do you stand on the Great Reset the liberals are planning on introducing?

ANSWER by Alberta PM Jason Kenney:

First of all, what is this Great Reset? When Pierre Poilievre, Federal Conservative Finance critic recently raised some concern about the Great Reset, he was attacked by the Liberals and by the Media saying that the Great Reset was a conspiracy theory. It’s not a conspiracy theory. The Great Reset is actually the name of a book by Klaus Schwab, a prominent advocate of the Great Reset. The book says that governments, societies, and the world should seize the opportunity provided by the public health and its consequent economic crisis to re-imagine the world and radically change policies. The question is, change policies in what ways? I would describe it as a grab bag of leftwing ideas for less freedom and more government – for more government intervention, for policies that in my opinion would create massive poverty - particularly in energy policy, and the other policies he is advocating. Klaus Schwab by the way is the President and the founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF) also known as the Davos summit. I call it the gathering of biggest global hypocrites in history. It’s a little ski village in Switzerland where every February a couple of thousand super rich people - millionaires, billionaires, global CEOs and politicians fly into Davos in hundreds of private aircraft they go into Switzerland and spend a week basically lecturing the rest of the world including specially working men and women about how they should reduce their carbon footprint. The hypocrisy in that crowd is so thick you can’t even cut it with a knife. No, I’m not going to be taking any policy directions from Klaus Schwab or his ilk. What I find offensive, look, the so called Great Reset is not a conspiracy theory. It is an actual set of concrete proposals being advocated by some very influential people, including Prime Minister Trudeau, who clearly alluded to it, referred to it, quotes from it, and described the Schwab Theory in a positive light in a speech he gave to the UN a couple of months ago. So it is not a conspiracy theory to talk about that. Those are the folks advocating it. And I think it is perfectly legitimate for democratically elected leaders like me to say "Heck No! We are not going to exploit or take advantage of a crisis to advance a political agenda. If we’re actually all in this together, then how can we focus on the crisis in protecting lives and livelihoods, helping people get through this. And how about after that? Instead of exploiting the crisis (to advance a political agenda that could not have been advanced with reason and therefore needs a crisis, to impose on democratic societies a whole bunch of failed socialist policy ideas. How about instead, we get refocused on generating economic growth, on recreating some of the trillions of dollars of wealth that will have been destroyed? Restarting some of the hundreds and thousands of businesses that will have gone under. Of obsessively focusing on getting them, the tens of millions around the world back to work. Those who have suffered most around the world in the Covid era have been the poorest. So the notion that we would then drive them through into energy poverty through Klaus Schwab’s policy agenda is … I just frankly find it offensive. So, no it is not a conspiracy, nor is it a conspiracy theory, I think it’s just very distasteful and regrettable that influential people would explicitly seek to take advantage of a crisis like this to advance their own political vision and values.- The Great Reset

From my cool Climatescope:

Václav Klaus of Czech. (1941-)

In Mar. 2007 global warming skeptic economist-politician Vaclav (Václav) Klaus (1941-), pres. #2 of the Czech Repub. in 2003-13 gave a speech at the Cato Inst. in Washington, D.C., uttering the soundbyte: "Environmentalism should belong in the social sciences, along with other isms such as communism, feminism, and liberalism", and compared environmentalism to a religion, a "modern counterpart of communism that seeks to change peoples' habits and economic systems." In June 2007 he pub. an op-ed in The Financial Times, calling environmentalism "the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, a market economy and prosperity", calling on readers to oppose the term "scientific consensus", adding that "it is always achieved only by a loud minority, never by a silent majority." In Sept. 2007 he spoke at the 2007 U.N. Climate Change Conference, calling for a second IPCC to be established to produce competing reports, and for countries to be left alone to set their priorities and prepare their own plans for the problem. In 2007 he pub. the book Blue Planet in Green Shackles: What Is Endangered: Climate or Freedom?, which contains the soundbyte: "The theory of global warming and the hypothesis on its causes, which has spread around massively nowadays, may be a bad theory, it may also be a valueless theory, but in any case it is a very dangerous theory." In Sept. 2009 he speaks at the 2009 U.N. Climate Change Conference, calling it "propagandistic" and "undignified". On Oct. 19, 2010 he uttered the soundbyte: "It seems to me that the widespread acceptance of the global warming dogma has become one of the main, most costly and most undemocratic public policy mistakes in generations. The previous one was communism." On July 26, 2011 he spoke at the Nat. Press Club, calling global warming "a Communist conspiracy." On May 21, 2012 he spoke at the Heartland Inst. 7th Internat. Conference on Climate Change. Watch video - Vaclav Klaus. Watch video - Vaclav Klaus. Watch video - Vaclav Klaus. Watch video - Vaclav Klaus.

--------------------

The Great Reset Will Be a Nightmare)

Marxists promise a utopia after they brutally and bloodily burn down capitalism, but what people really get is a nightmare where people are reduced to worker ants who lose their soul to the godless State. Too bad, since the Marxist utopias are always built by murderers who can't nullify the law of natural justice, anybody even looking like they might rock the boat ends up being herded into extermination camps until the whole charade blows up in their faces, and those still alive realize they have been robbed of everything they could have built. People forget that the word "utopia" means "nowhere".

Spoiler: The Americans of the future?

--------------------

U.S. Pres. Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924) Edward Mandell House (1858-1930) The Robber Barons
In 1913 the Great Reset started with U.S. Pres. #28 (1913-21) Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924) and Col. Edward Mandell House (1858-1930), who engineered the passage of the 1913 U.S. Revenue Act (beginning of the modern income tax) and the 1913 U.S. Federal Reserve Act (creating the U.S. central banking system), and has been growing like a global octopus ever since. Every advance in science and technology gets immediately perverted to their evil ends, with George Orwell’s "1984" used as a manual. It’s now turning a new corner with the U.S. Communist Democratic Party and Joe Biden, who are racing to plunge the U.S. into the Great Reset with or without popular support.

Edward Mandell House (1858-1930) Elihu Root of the U.S. (1845-1937)) John William Davis of the U.S. (1873-1955)

Big date for conspiracy theorists? On July 29, 1921 the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded in Washington D.C. by Col. Edward Mandell House (1858-1938), chief advisor to Pres. Wilson as the U.S. counterpart of the English Royal Inst. of Internat. Affairs; the first honorary pres. was Repub. politician-atty. Elihu Root (1845-1937), winner of the 1912 Nobel Peace Prize; the first elected pres. was Dem. politician John William Davis (1873-1955), who unsuccessfully ran for U.S. pres. in 1924 against Repub. incumbent Calvin Coolidge.

Al Gore of the U.S. (1948-) Al Gore of the U.S. (1948-)

Now that the U.N. and its IPCC have put their puppet Pres. Biden in the White House to attempt to force their agenda on the people via executive orders under the label "Build Back Better", they no longer have to hold back their final plans but are going all-out, with what they call Environmental Social [and Corporate)] Governance (ESG), coined by the U.N. in 2005. No surprise, the 2022 World Economic Forum meeting featured huckster Albert Arnold "Al" Gore Jr. (1948-) hawking his scam called Climate TRACE (Tracking Real-Time Atmospheric Carbon Emissions) (launched in 2021), with the soundbyte: "It’s a coalition of artificial intelligence technology companies, NGOs, and universities, using data from 300 existing satellites from multiple countries, ground, sea and air-based censors, and internet data streams, to use machine-learning to create algorithms for every single sub-sector of the economy.” This colossal data-collection project aims to replace the current self-reporting system of greenhouse gas emissions by countries and companies, who have committed to net zero goals, by publishing reports of climate offenders so that countries, companies, and even individuals can be 'held accountable.' The Google-backed AI algorithm used by Climate TRACE appears to lay the framework for enforcing ESG initiatives heavily pushed by financial behemoths such as BlackRock, as well as a technocratic social and climate credit system."

What will really result if the Al Gore Big Tech industry-killer goes to work with full U.S. govt. backing? A slaughterhousing of the entire U.S. economy and a halt to economic growth, hooray for the Marxist team.

Most Americans see "Build Back Better" as a clunky campaign slogan. They don’t realize it was being echoed by the globalists at the World Economic Forum long before Biden’s campaign was instructed to invoke it. It isn’t just about recovery from pandemic woes, as most Americans believe. The entire notion of building back better is that the current Western- and capitalism-dominated society is flawed beyond repair and must be destroyed so the architects of The Great Reset can build their Neo-Marxist utopia.

They don’t see the world as a structure that can be repainted, remodeled, and added to over time. They see the only way to make the structure truly better in their vision is to demolish it completely and rebuild it from scratch. Yes, they realize that means destitution and death for hundreds of millions, perhaps billions. But from their perspective, the world is overpopulated anyway. Why not cull the herd before subjugating the masses?

The Great Reset Plan
You will own nothing, and you will be forced to pretend like you’re happy about it. - How George Soros and Klaus Schwab Conned Many American Patriots into Unwittingly Backing the Great Reset

The Great Reset Plan
Klaus Schwab is the head of the World Economic Forum; he founded the organization in 1971. Each year, the WEF hosts a massive conference in Davos, Switzerland, with thousands of world leaders, diplomats and experts on various topics gathering to trade ideas about how best to cooperatively run the world. Lest this characterization be seen as overstating the case, Schwab himself said as much this year in opening the conference: "The future is not just happening. The future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in this room. We have the means to improve the state of the world. But two conditions are necessary. The first one is that we act all as stakeholders of larger communities, that we serve not only self-interest but we serve the community. That’s what we call stakeholder responsibility. And second, that we collaborate.”

This is the call to action for elitists the world over. They appoint themselves the representatives of global interests - without elections, without accountability - and then create mechanisms of national and international order to control citizens over whom they claim to preside. Schwab himself has decoded his favorite term, "stakeholder capitalism.” He wrote in Time magazine in October 2020, "Free markets, trade and competition create so much wealth that in theory they could make everyone better off if there was the will to do so.” To do so, however, would require taking hints from Greta Thunberg, #MeToo and Black Lives Matter; it would require "building … a virtuous economic system” in which companies abandon their core mission of serving customers and shareholders and instead embrace answering questions like "What is the gender pay gap in company X? How many people of diverse backgrounds were hired and promoted? What progress has the company made toward reducing its greenhouse-gas emissions?”

- Ben Shapiro: The Elitists Who Want to Rule the World

"Concern for the environment is a good thing, but the environmentalist movement is not. Environmentalists use the environment to create a social revolution just as communists used workers to create a social revolution. Its activists are fanatics. Its consequences are nihilism. Environmentalists are, intentionally or not, in collusion with Putin to undermine America and the West."- How Environmentalists Help Putin

My role today is to set the stage for the Greater Reset by looking at the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, the 4th industrial revolution, UN Agenda 2030, and, of course, the larger plan within which this all revolves, which isUnited Nations Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development.

We are witnessing the Great Purge,
the Great Concentration of Wealth and Power,
the Great Reveal of Willing Dictators,
the Great Reallocation of Resources,
The Great Digital Revolution of the Surveillance State.
The Agenda for the 21st Century and beyond.
It’s the Great Rehash of the Old Plan.

I’m going to start there.

UN Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development is the comprehensive blueprint, the plan of action as the UN calls it,to inventory and control all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, energy, education, information, and all human beings in the world. This is the Agenda for the 21st century. A blueprint for 100 years with milestones at 2020, 2030, 2035 and 2050. Agenda 2030 is just a milestone within the main plan.

Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development is the global plan for inventory and control. It encompasses every aspect of your life and it is intended to be a wrenching transformation of your life,as Sen. Al Gore called it at the largest gathering of heads of state and national representatives ever convened to that time, in Rio de Janeiro Brazil, in 1992. Representatives of one hundred and 78 nations plus the Vatican agreed to this action plan.

Although it is, as Wikipedia states, a non-binding voluntary agreement, Agenda 21 is binding on you. It has been written into the laws of your countries, including China and all Western and Middle Eastern nations through a collaboration of government, corporations, and organizations & foundations.

It’s a global plan but it’s not an international plan. International means between nations, but this plan erases nations. It’s GLOBAL.

It’s a global plan that’s implemented locally so it has a different name everywhere, but it’s the same plan. Every aspect of your life is affected, so it’s in your school curricula, in your planning and building department, in your court system, in your health care system, everywhere. But it’s never called Agenda 21.

You’ll see it as regional plans called Plan Bay Area or 4 States One Vision, or Mexico2030 or Hanoi 2030, or Horizon2050 in Canada for example.

They’re all the same plan. They elevate major economic power centers to a supra-governmental status, outside of and above the traditional representative government model.

These are the MEGAREGIONS. They drive the economy and overpower the nationstate. They combine parts of cities, states, and even combine nations - destroying boundaries and ignoring the legal jurisdictions by creating new economic princedoms, new fiefdoms. Not govt but governance.

Governance is a system made up of public sector agencies, non-profits, biz orgs, advocacy groups, foundations, and corporations.

You don’t vote for any of this. The larger the entity the less power you have. You get taken out of the picture.

This is New Global State in which you’re a Global Citizen.

The New State is the means by which you must serve others for the Common Good—defined by the State. It’s supposedly from the bottom up, something you want, but its really an end run around your sovereignty—eroded piece by piece.

So what is the Agenda 21 plan?

When it’s shown to the public it’s primarily a land use plan. The rallying cry for SD is that we’re killing the planet with our CO2 emissions so the plan is designed to corral populations into what the UN calls islands of human habitation.

Of course once you’re in that concentrated island of human habitation, formerly called a city, you’re more easily managed, controlled, and surveilled.

A city like the one that Sidewalk Labs, a subsidiary of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, a city like they had planned for an area of Toronto. That city was to have had sensors embedded everywhere, literally, and residents would have services restricted unless they exposed every aspect of their lives digitally. If, as a resident, you refused to have your data linked to your identity, you would have less rights than others.

This is the Smart City. A city where I believe virtual and augmented reality will replace real life, and actually be more appealing. Ultimately people may spend their entire lives living virtually. And those lives will be short. What’s the justification for this dystopia?

The story is that your greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by consolidating populations into dense city centerswhere energy and water usage can be limited.

This gets you out of the rural areas where you can do what you want, raise livestock, grow food with water from your well, drive your farm truck, and own a firearm.

In order to implement Agenda 21 your country, state, county, parish, canton, city is imposing this land use plan locally because where you live has a lot to do with how you live and what your life will be.

Your old life has to be transforme - code for destroyed, and rebuilt: the new normal. This includes both what they call ‘the built environment’ and the way that you use that physical space.

Your beliefs and expectations have to be transformed and rebuilt as well. Your energy use, water use, food consumption, social structure, work, health and life expectancy views - all must be transformed.

Much of this is determined in that regional plan.

How do they destroy your rights? You don’t vote for it. You pay for it. Federal and State grants pay for consultants who basically contract to push this through the community.

When the few concerned citizens show up to the visioning meetings and charrettes, as they call them, to object, the consultants are there to block opposition and indoctrinate the public.

The consultants are trained change agents and organizational managers who are there to give the impression that they’ve listened to the public and the public approves the plan. But it’s all an act.

I think you’ll agree that this is a big deal, a tough sell, and a huge management problem even with deception and the collusion of the corporate media.

The partnership. It’s not easy to destroy nearly 500 years of the nationstate, so it has to be done incrementally using all of the power and influence of government, corporations, and organizations, including all tech, entertainment, media, and education.

It’s a mega-corporate plan, a joint partnership, a public private partnership between government, the world’s largest corporations, banking conglomerates, the big money foundations, like the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and groups like the World Wildlife Fund and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment.

It’s a closed circle that only includes you when you agree with their plan. That’s what is meant by getting the approval of the community. The community is anyone who agrees with the plan. Dissent is not permitted.

These major foundations give grants to thousands of startup organizations, train and fund spin-off groups like benevolent non-profits and neighborhood associations, and generally act as the bureaucracy for the new system.

This project is the ultimate enemy of the individual.

So to make Agenda 21 happen requires the full integration of systems in order to control them centrally, the standardization of all systems in which the new currency is information and energy.

In order to have centralized control, full globalization, it’s necessary to standardize: All law, all education, all culture, all finance, in order to merge, must be standardized.

This was impossible until the advent of the computer age. Now it’s inevitable. This is why every schoolchild is given a computer and the internet is now in tiny villages in every nation.

Your educational system is used to manipulate you into thinking of yourself as a Global Citizen. A Global Citizen is not a citizen at all, and has no rights. Under UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development, what is termed a ‘right’ is really a privilege which can be taken away or granted at any time. And conversely, of course, punishment imposed without redress.

This explains how the U.N. can call universal Internet connectivity a human right. During Covid, UNICEF the U.N. Children’s Educational Fund created a project called GIGA. The goal is to get every school in the world to do online classes. The term for this is Direct Instruction - nothing comes between the child and the computer. It makes standardized indoctrination easy.

You all know that as a startup Google was funded by the intelligence community in order to spy on people who searched specific topics on the Internet and identify them. Basically to turn the tables on you and expose you to surveillance. Now billions of people carry a surveillance device at all times.

When you hear the term SMART, whether it’s a smart phone, smart car, smart home, or whatever, this is an acronym. S.M.A.R.T.: Sustainability Monitoring Assessing Rating Tracking. You.

GIGA, the children’s universal connectivity project, has digitalized more in 10 weeks of Covid than in the last 10 years. For this they need 5G. And for that they need decentralized energy production.

This enables digital-ized experimentation and spying on large populations without their consent or knowledge.

A sort of digital colonization.

Megacorporations are searching for people who add value, who are innovators. Corporations want to own innovation. Not everyone has value in this system. Most do not. Most likely you are worth less than your student loans.

Your value, your social credit score, is based on whether you produce more than you consume, and whether you serve, or obstruct, the State.

Government has overcome our constitutional rights by merging with private corporations who can operate without restraint, in secret, punishing, purging, and disappearing dissidents, as Facebook, and Google, and Twitter, and Amazon have done virtually. This is globalization.

Globalization erases boundaries going from the city all the way up to the nation. It is the end of representative government.

Now you may think that government is an obstacle, a danger, and doesn’t represent you anyway, so who cares? I do know who I’m speaking to here, and I agree.

But, at least in the United States, government was originally conceived as representative. You, a busy farmer or merchant, elected a representative who agreed to give up a few years of their life to handling that stuff so you didn’t have to. These positions were never intended to be lifelong gigs. Now people like Pelosi and McConnell are in govt. for 50 years. Why? Because they keep getting voted in. The money that elects them keeps them there.

At the top power has no party.

What do Globalist Controllers want? Agenda 21 is designed for management efficiency.

Megacorporations want to have harmonized, integrated laws and regs, and as few as possible, so that they don’t have to change their business or retool to sell in different markets.

They want no borders and open markets. They want to kill competition and engineer demand. They want to deal with as few decision makers as possible, ideally just ONE. They want to merge with government.

They want workers suited for the work needed, easily discarded. They want to own innovation so they want a direct connection with universities.

They want to control all resources, human and natural. Humans are a resource or, more likely,a hindrance.

Megacorporations need full control and total information. This is the Digital Revolution. It’s the 4th Industrial Revolution. The Great Reset.

The previous three industrial revolutions mainly focused on energy and hardware. Whether it was steam or gas or electronics, these new energies radically restructured society from the family, to work, to cities, to government.

The 4th Industrial Revolution, the Digital Revolution, the explosion of technology moving faster than the speed of ethics and oversight, eclipses the previous three.

From Artificial Intelligence with the potential to change the nature of the human being, to robotics used for policing, to SMART buildings and sensors that monitor us continuously, this revolution enables an uncertain future.

The 4th industrial revolution, in the context of the first three represents a phenomenal acceleration in terms of time and the ability to control the masses.

Transform And Disrupt. Build Back Better. You can’t rebuild it unless you break it first. They call it the New Social Contrac - that you didn’t agree to. The Great Reset concept that you won’t own anything and will rent anything you need, needs to be looked at through the lens of private property.

YOU are your most important private property. To lose ownership of your freedom of speech, of movement, basically of free will, means you lose what is most important to you.

Reducing your expectations for a full life and forcing you into a new era of austerity, of scarcity isn’t easy. The loss of freedom in the most vital of ways, the independence and privacy of the body and mind, demands what they call the new normal. You don’t come to that place without major crisis.

The self-styled globalist controllers, who intend to direct the future, considered what kind of a crisis would be necessary to make One World Governance, Globalization, a reality that expands beyond just the corporations into our homes and our bodies.

The way I look at it, is that global crisis requires a global response, and that justifies global governance.

Really it takes a major crisis, a global crisis to break the identification with your nation and culture. Something like Climate Change. Creating an existential terror that we are destroying the planet, and our entire way of life is a threat to its continued existence. It’s not science. Science is made to fit the desired result. This is the Green Mask.

Behind that mask of environmental concern is the lust for global centralized totalitarian control. The Climate Change threat is a stage, a phase designed to prepare us for more restrictions and limitations. Now we’re experiencing a more pervasive and restrictive threat - the big gun: The new existential threat is Covid 19. In fact, the World Wildlife Fund says that Covid is "Nature’s response to man’s abuse of the environment". Nature is a terrorist.

Invisible, colorless, odorless, scarcely detectable, Covid is the New Mask for the New Normal.

9/11 was the justification for the security state. Covid enables the surveillance state. Covid justifies global enforcement.

Truly tailor-made for the New World Order, Covid has ushered in house arrest, purges of truth tellers, self-censoring, economic collapse,the full empowerment of the mega-corporations, and the lineup of willing dictators from Macron in France to Ardern in New Zealand to Trudeau in Canada to Harris in the U.S. to Cuomo, Newsom, Whitmer, Garcetti, Lightfoot, and dozens of others across the world.

In the competition for rule of the megaregions the willing collaborators are stepping up. Locally as well, of course.

This is really what the last 4 years have been about. Separate the wheat from the chaff, the loyal from the dissidents. That’s how it’s done.

Mao Tse Tung did this in China with his Let A Hundred Flowers Bloom Campaign. He encouraged his loyal followers to critique his programs so that he could make them better. But really, he did it to identify and purge critics. And he did.

What I’m talking about is power. Those with power want to keep it. Those without it want it. There have always been people who wanted to control the world. What has changed is that the capability for control has expanded in velocity and scope in a way that has never before been possible.

And now, as I conclude, I’d like to encourage you to be brave, and to find the joy in simply being alive. Ask yourself what you value. Recognize that you yourself are part of the reason that we are in this situation.

Have you preferred convenience to liberty? The free world requires liberty with responsibility, and that takes work. The work we do can be full of pitfalls, full of controlled opposition which appears to be the answer but instead is a green-washed candy-coated, twisted circle of propaganda back to the green mask.

Stop. Think. Never go along to get along. Know that there will be no Switzerland in this new world, no place to hide, so the time to resist is NOW.

Refuse to collaborate. Don’t carry a smart phone, don’t volunteer to give your biometrics or DNA, don’t cooperate, opt out while you can. Prepare to work to stay free. Above all, my friends, remember who you are, laugh, dance, and love! Join us in creating the Greater Reset!

- Rosa Koire (d. May 31, 2021) - UN Agenda 21 and The Great Reset: Dropping The Mask [The Greater Reset, Jan. 25, 2021]

Rose Kore videos

What is your opinion of the controversy regarding Klaus Schwab and the ‘Great Reset initiative’? - Lembit Tork

Fox & Sen.Rand Paul: OWG—"It's not a conspiracy theory, It's in their mission statement." (video)

Great reset architects to lay ‘urban transformation’ HQ cornerstone in Detroit. Digital identity, health monitoring among top 10 technologies driving WEF’s urban transformation agenda: perspective

Back to Environmental Social Governance (ESG):

* Over the last 5-10 years, "ESG"–standing for Environmental Social Governance–has gone from an acronym that virtually no one knew or cared about, to a cultishly-embraced top priority of financial regulators, markets, and institutions around the world.

* The preposterous **financial pretense** of "ESG investing " is that the promoters of it have so accurately identified universal norms of long-term value creation - Environmental norms, Social norms, and Governance norms - that impose those norms on every company is justified.

* In reality, ESG was **a movement cooked up at the UN** - not exactly a leading expert in profitable investment - **to impose moral and political agendas, largely left-wing ones**, on institutions that would not adopt them if left to their own devices.

* The number one **practical policy** advocated by the ESG movement today is: **divest from fossil fuels in every way possible** and associate yourself with "renewable" solar and wind in every way possible. This policy is helping destroy energy production around the world.

* ESG’s immoral energy policy:

* Divesting from fossil fuels is immoral because: The world needs much more energy. Fossil fuels are the only way to provide most of that energy for the foreseeable future. Any problems associated with CO2 pale in comparison to problems of energy deprivation.

* The world needs much more energy

* Low-cost, reliable energy enables human beings to use modern machines to be productive and prosperous. Yet 3 billion people still use less electricity than a typical American refrigerator. 2.6 billion people are still using wood or dung for heating and cooking.

- The ESG Movement is Anti-Energy Anti-Development and Anti-Human

Climate Change Weekly #436: Woke Investing Gets Well-Deserved Pushback

Sustainable investing has become the hottest trend in the global financial community, corresponding to the chorus of calls for businesses to be more "socially responsible.” Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores are the primary method by which a variety of actors - including international organizations, global political and economic elites, and Wall Street titans - have cascaded these objectives to the rest of society.

The efforts of these global leaders - which include individuals such as BlackRock strongman Larry Fink, World Economic Forum Chairman Klaus Schwab, and President Joe Biden - have been largely successful. Ninety-eight percent of U.S. companies now disclose ESG scores, and more than 15,000 global companies have signed on to the United Nations Global Compact that champions ESG’s utilization.

Essentially, ESG is a social credit system that coerces companies to act upon social justice and environmental objectives. Putting aside the substantial evidence that scores will soon be disseminated to individuals’ financial profiles, ESG scores are currently used to evaluate a business entity’s investment risk, with ratings companies and investment firms working in tandem to develop arbitrary metrics related to these objectives.

ESG scores are supposed to ultimately screen out certain companies with unfavorable ratings by steering away investment. Simultaneously, they elevate companies that perform well on a series of interconnected normative and financial metrics which are somehow amalgamated into one overarching score. In addition to traditional financial metrics, some of the key areas included are related to human rights and working conditions, governance transparency, indigenous peoples’ rights, hazardous substance management, energy production, and consumers’ rights, among other topics.

This score is supposed to resemble a company’s overall risk profile. You are not alone if you are wondering how this could possibly assess risk fairly and objectively...

It would not be too far-fetched to consider that these ESG acolytes think fondly of China’s repressive society, because they draw inspiration for ESG from China’s social credit system. The same social credit system which has been the spear of China’s repressive capacity for the better part of the past decade.

Regardless of motivations, it is important to remember that these scores are used to steer investors towards certain companies, while screening out others. Essentially, if ExxonMobil and China Petrochemical Corporation are presented as potential investment options, the idea is that the "socially conscious” investor should choose the Chinese company based upon its higher ESG score. I wonder how much money has been funneled to companies that are our diametric geopolitical opponents in the name of sustainability - which these foreign companies clearly do not practice nor care about.

- Jack McPherrin: ESG Ratings are Counterproductive, Hypocritical, and Anti-American

Here are a few of the ways the Great Reset is being put into place. We’ve already experienced the effects of Biden shutting down the nation’s oil supply, in the name of climate change. Next, the Biden Regime issued an executive order to lock away a massive amount of land in the U.S. the plan is called 30×30 – locking away 30% of all the land and resources by the year 2030.

Thousands of acres of privately-owned, food producing farmland in the Midwest Corn Belt have been targeted for a new 1300-mile-long pipeline ... NOT a pipeline to bring us desperately needed fuel oil. No - the purpose of this one is capture CO2 and transport it underground! All as an excuse to stop global warming.

Right now, letters are going out to targeted farmers in five states, telling them of the coming Heartland Green Way and asking them to voluntarily give up their valuable land. The letter goes on to inform them that if they don’t join in voluntarily - their land will have to be confiscated by eminent domain.

In addition to taking that land out of food production, the plan also calls for the establishment of 17 million acres of solar farms and 250 million acres of wind farms.

Wind and solar are a joke. They produce next to nothing in the way of energy. At best they will produce about 4% of the energy we need. What it will do is wipe out birds in the sky and destroy thousands of acres of needed farmland - causing a massive food shortage.

The American beef industry is now forced to comply to the rules of the Global Round Table for Sustainable Beef. These rules force expensive and unnecessary rules for growing beef. As a result, we have lost thousands of beef producers. More attacks on our food supply.

But they are not done. In the cities, a major effort is now underway to eliminate zoning protections for single family neighborhoods. This is part of the Sustainable Smart Growth plan to eliminate private property and put us all in stack and pack high rises, where our energy use and transportation is fully controlled. Sustainable!

How about your personal choices in life? How will they be affected? How will you be forced to toe the line? You’ve witnessed the unrelenting drive for a complete digital lifestyle, where everything about you is on-line, from your bank accounts, to all that you purchase at the grocery, to your posts on social media.

If your buying habits - as recorded on your credit cards and online bank accounts - show that you have purchased a gun or ammunition - that will begin a personal profile of you. Add to that the kind of food you buy - perhaps you purchased beef, but not enough vegetables - that may indicate you are not living a healthy, sustainable lifestyle. How much electricity do you use? Where have you traveled and how did you get there? How many buildings do you own? What kinds of things do you invest in?

Each of these things represents your climate footprint and your dedication to social justice. Are you a proper citizen in this reorganization of human society?

Now, here is how all of this will personally affect you. Each of these things will be regularly entered into your profile and each one will affect your personal credit rating. A low credit rating will prevent you from getting a loan to buy a car, obtaining a mortgage, or even a business loan. This will effectively cut you out of society if you don’t change your habits and personal beliefs.

This is just a sample of what will happen if the Great Reset is allowed to move forward. Eighty-one international banks have joined in partnership with the World Bank, along with the International monetary Fund and the U.S. Federal Reserve - which oversees all U.S. banks, plus our money supply.

Paper money will be replaced with digital currency that can disappear with a single key stroke, should you fail to conform. Universal income will finally make us all equal - equally poor and under control of whatever gang is in charge of the government plantation.

Perhaps you’ve heard this slogan about the Great Reset: No one will own anything and be happy about it. What does that mean? Schwab calls it a Circular Economy. For example: A clothing store sells shirts for profit. The shirts have value because they are needed by society. ut in the circular economy, the clothing store will not sell the shirts - they will rent them. Then when you return the shirts, the store will create a new secondhand product to continue renting them. The same will go for housing, furniture, appliances, and cars.

Under the Great Reset there will be no independent sovereign nations. That’s the force behind the invasion of our borders with illegals pouring over. There will be no democratic representation. All decisions will be handed down from the top. Appointed regionalism is to be the new representation.

There will be no private property. All housing will be government rental property. This is the reason for the major push to eliminate zoning protection for single family homes. It’s the first step.

Social equity will rule every decision. Universal basic income for everyone - all fair - all equally poor. Corporate Social Responsibility - all companies controlled from above. Beef consumption stopped. Farming practices forced to comply with strict sustainable rules. Netzero requirements will eliminate all sources of energy but wind and solar - which do not work.

The Great Reset is the reinvention of communism. It is the total destruction of our culture, economic system, and personal freedom. The forces behind this care not one whit about you, your future hopes and dreams. It’s about power - their power to enforce an agenda of global control.

The incredible fact every American must understand is that the Great Reset is being enforced through your local city council, county commission, state legislature, and federal edict. It can be stopped - but only if you finally stand up and say NO! Your time for decision - to live free or to just submit - has finally come. The choice is yours.

- The Great Reset: Will You Submit Or Stop It?, Tom DeWeese, Pres., Am. Policy Center

The Great Reset is not just an elitist idea - it’s not even a socialist utopian concept. It’s a real-world fascist threat to every American from Wall Street to Main Street. It’s happening now in policies and cultural shifts big and small, obvious and subtle, from environmental promises to corporations going woke. But the mainstream media, global elites, and politicians brushed off the Great Reset as "nothing to see here." Another myth they push: "The World Economic Forum is just a conference for elites who have no REAL power." Glenn first exposed the Great Reset almost two years ago, and the globalist cries of "conspiracy theorist" soon followed. They said he believed the WEF was a "master cabal calling the shots from some evil underground lair." But Glenn Beck never said that. Instead, he uncovered the true intentions of global leaders in finance and politics by simply highlighting their own words. This week, the same global elites are doubling down on their agenda at the World Economic Forum’s Davos Agenda virtual event. But still, the global elites - like Twitter’s Jack Dorsey - are trying to downplay the WEF’s influence to stop people like us from interfering with their plans. The oligarchy will prosper in the new world order they’ve designed. You will not. - Glenn Beck

Beware ‘The Great Reset’ For A Post-COVID World

Tucker Carlson: The elites want COVID-19 lockdowns to usher in a 'Great Reset' and that should terrify you

Delingpole: German Economist Says ‘Great Reset Will Cause a Crash Worse than 1930s’

Pandemic is chance to reset global economy, says Prince Charles

Green recovery must end the reign of GDP, argue Cambridge and UN economists

WATCH: Rand Paul Exposes The WEF Elitist’s Plan To Create A One World Government — BLASTS MSM For Claiming It’s A ‘Conspiracy Theory’

In my book, Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order, I dedicated an entire chapter to this titled Technocracy is Sustainable Development. The chapter concludes, "After an exhaustive historical inquiry, I can confidently state that the only specifically-designed replacement economic model created in the history of the world was: Technocracy!" Thus, it is clear that Sustainable Development is Technocracy. Making this connection now will help the reader to understand the balance of this book in its proper context. The Sustainable Development movement has taken careful steps to conceal its true identity, strategy and purpose, but once the veil is lifted, you will never see it any other way. Once its strategy is unmasked, everything else will start to make sense. (emphasis added) What people most commonly fail to see is that if the economic system is radically changed, then everything changes. Technocracy’s coup d’etat is not political - it is economic! - Steven Guinness Breaking Down the Global Elite’s ‘Great Reset’ Master Plan

Agenda 21 is the Blueprint for the Great Reset

The Real Global Warming Disaster is Financial

The Great Reset is Trending: Here's Why

It is thus a great mistake to contrast, as leftists unenlightened by Marxist dialectics often do, humanly caused climate change with natural catastrophes such as covid-19. (Remember, the scale and scope of these is not allowed to be questioned.) Both result from capitalist exploitation of nature. This comes about through stripping the rainforests and expelling carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The rise in temperature that results from the burning of fossil fuels also disturbs the pathogens ensconced in the forests.

Following Lenin, he asks, what is to be done? The answer does not lie in anarchism. A stateless world may be a dream for the far future, but right now we require a strong state to curb the capitalist exploiters responsible for our woes. Some find the anarchist theorist James Scott insightful, but he is at fault for his failure to respond to the exigencies of our current crisis.

It is not James Scott whom we need now but Lenin. He realized that before the state can wither away, it must be strengthened to deal ruthlessly with the class enemy. Lenin in his "The Impending Catastrophe and How to Combat It," written in September 1917, said that to combat Russia’s loss of territory and resources, the state should control the economy in the same way the belligerent powers had already done during World War I. "Here, then, was Lenin’s wager: to take measures already instituted by the warring states, step them up a notch, and deploy them a gainst the drivers of catastrophe" (p. 127, emphasis in original). Readers of Mises will not fail to note that he too saw the central control of the German economy during the war as a way to establish socialism.

What we need now is "war communism." Malm admits that "this term leaves an acid taste. Rightly so. The warring Bolsheviks committed no small amount of cruelty" (pp. 158–59). But contrary to anticommunist propaganda, war communism in one respect succeeded magnificently. "Having the Whites and the allied empires arrayed against them - zero fossil fuels versus all the reserves in the world - the Red Army won the war. In this isolated respect, the period from late 1918 to late 1920 was the finest hour of the Soviet state".

What would "war communism" be like for us now? Malm has little in the way of a velvet glove that conceals the iron fist. He says,

Regardless of whether the problem is attacked from the supply or the demand side, the race to zero [carbon emissions] would have to be coordinated through control measures - rationing, reallocating, requisitioning, sanctioning, ordering… ecological Leninism leaps at any opportunity to… break with business-as-usual as sharply as required and subject the regions of the economy working towards catastrophe to direct public control. It would mean that "one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part", to speak with Engels.
- The Socialists' Plan for "Ecological Leninism"

Facebook and Climate Feedback Assisting the Great Reset

WEF Covid-19 Great Reset: "Today’s consumers do not want … goods and services for a reasonable price."

Australian Media Finally Calls Out Davos ‘Great Reset’ Agenda [Video]

Will Capitalism Be forced To Go Green?

In 2021, let’s challenge green tyranny

GOP Senate Must Red Light Biden’s Radical Green Appointees

How can we solve the climate change problem without a global totalitarian government, that would use military force against any country that doesn’t conform? - TLW

How long will it be until it is completely obvious that catastrophic climate change is coming and is unavoidable, or that the whole prediction is wrong? - John Walker

A huge push driving the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming scam is the $trillions of dollars to be made in the climate change industry by ultra-wealthy investors and corporations, many of which have undue influence (or even "own") our politicians with huge campaign contributions or offers of future lucrative jobs that require no special knowledge or significant work (just like Hunter Biden and his positions with wealthy gas corporations in exchange for influence on Joe).

Many of these wealthy investors are also owners of the military-industrial complex or own huge numbers of shares in their corporations. So, like so many typical climate alarm hypocrites (such as Gore, Kerry and Obama), they scream about how horrible the "little people" are for using fossil fuels while they invest in industries which create more CO2 than many others, fly around the world in fossil fuel-guzzling private jets and purchase multi-million-dollar week-end oceanfront mansions. What a bunch of creeps!

So, yes we are "barking up the wrong tree", but not for the reason many think. It’s mainly because there is absolutely NO proof/experimental validation that human emissions of CO2 are leading to catastrophic global warming- NONE. Furthermore, it cannot even be tested since that would require manipulating atmospheric CO2 levels over a period of years, decades or longer in order to observe how the multitude of factors affecting climate, including multiple feedback systems, react to these changes. This means the supposition is a pseudo-scientific hypothesis - Why is there no movement against the military industries and yet there is so much parlaying on climate? - John Walker

John Kerry of the U.S. (1943-) John Kerry of the U.S. (1943-)

Speaking of the wealthy. On Jan. 20, 2021 far-left Dem. politician John Kerry (1943-) became Pres. Biden's special pres. envoy for climate, going on to stink up the U.S. with his unhinged demands to kill fossil fuels and lock down the hoi poloi.

John Kerry Says Great Reset Is Needed to Stop the Rise of Populism

John Kerry On Gas Prices: “We Absolutely Don’t” Need To Drill For More Oil

John Kerry Wants to Emulate COVID Lockdowns for Climate Change (Guest: Gregory Wrightstone) (video)

Republicans Introduce Bill to Defund ‘Climate Tyrant’ John Kerry

Larry Fink (1952-)

One of the biggest members of the WEF is BlackRock, world's largest investment firm ($10 trillion in assets under management), whose LA-born billionaire CEO Laurence Douglas "Larry" Fink (1952-) demands that all companies go with the ESG program and divest from fossil fuels, or else.

BlackRock Duplicity Exposed As Real Capitalists Fight Back

WOW: Climate Crazy BlackRock Caught Investing in Red Chinese Oil Producer [VIDEO]

Pressure Campaign Exposes BlackRock Pro-Great Reset CEO Larry Fink as Lackey to the Communist Chinese

Why is Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, Visiting BlackRock Headquarters? (WATCH)

Mike Lofgren of the U.S.

On Feb. 21, 2014 longtime unelected Repub. Congressional staff member and insider Mike Lofgren (after he split with with the Repubs., calling them "an apocalyptic cult" that had come to betray their honest noble roots as the party of Lincoln) gave an interview on Moyers & Co., becoming the first to use the term Deep State, not about foreign govts. such as Turkey, but about the U.S., calling it a hydra-like incestuous product of the U.S. nat. security state and corporate America that is "out of control" and "unconstrained", with the soundbyte: "It is... the red thread that runs through the history of the last three decades. It is how we had deregulation, financialization of the economy, the Wall Street bust, the erosion or our civil liberties and perpetual war."

On Sept. 13, 2016 Lofgren pub. the book The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government, with the ad blurb:

Every four years, tempers are tested and marriages fray as Americans head to the polls to cast their votes. But does anyone really care what we think? Has our vaunted political system become one big, expensive, painfully scripted reality TV show? In this powerful expose of the sins and excesses of Beltwayland, a longtime Republican party insider argues that we have become an oligarchy in form if not in name. Hooked on war, genuflecting to big donors, in thrall to discredited economic theories and utterly bereft of a moral compass, America’s governing classes are selling their souls to entrenched interest while our bridges collapse, wages, stagnate, and our water is increasingly undrinkable.

Mike Lofgren was the first to use the term Deep State, in an essay and exclusive interview on Moyers and Company, to refer to a web of entrenched interests in the US government and beyond (most notably Wall Street and Silicon Valley, which controls access to our every click and swipe) that dictate America’s defense decisions, trade policies and priorities with little regard for the actual interests or desires of the American people. In this essential and eye-opening book Lofgren takes his argument one step further. Drawing on insights gleaned over three decades on Capitol Hill, much of it on the Budget Committee, he paints a gripping portrait of the dismal swamp on the Potomac and the revolution it will take to reclaim our government and set us back on course.

Previously on Aug. 2, 2012 Lofgren pub. the book The Party Is Over: How Republicans Went Crazy, Democrats Became Useless and the Middle Class Got Shafted.

After Donald Trump announced his candidacy for Repub. U.S. pres. on June 16, 2015 and after reading Lofgren began blaming the Deep State for most U.S. woes, conservatives ramped up talk about the Deep State, calling it a cabal of unelected lifer federal employees in Washington, D.C., who are allied with lifer elected Dem. politicians in Congress led by Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, and not just linked but owned by the U.N. global Marxists, especially the Red Chinese, who they suspect was a U.N. project from day one, with the long term goal of using China to replace the U.S. as the world leader while reducing the latter to an unimportant province in the U.N. Borg Hive. No surprise, despite the proof seen every day, global Marxist-owned Wikipedia claims that it's just a discredited political theory used by discredited U.S. pres. Donald Trump and his supporters as sour grapes, which actually confirms it along with their visible puppet strings.

The Deep State is Real - Politico Mag.

How the Deep State Came to America: A History

The “deep state” is real. But it’s not what Trump thinks it is.

Alex Newman

Author of the popular book "Deep State” and award-winning journalist Alex Newman says Deep State globalists are afraid the world is waking up to the tyranny they are trying to impose on every country on earth including America. The day Trump was elected, the Deep State came out of the woodwork to try to hamstring, obstruct, or even cancel his presidency, proving him right, but since Big Tech is owned by it, the vast audience of sheeple believes their ridiculous blanket denials even while being seen with their hands in the cookie jar.

Things are not going as smoothly into their so-called reset as they had envisioned.

Newman explains, "The Deep State is in a ‘do or die’ moment right now..."

"They, the elites or predator class, recognize that they are now locked into this. If they try to retreat, there is no retreat. People are waking up at such a rapid rate that they are in a moment where they are going to have to go for broke and try to impose the whole agenda and damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead or they are going to be in big trouble. They are going to be prosecuted. Right this moment, there are conversations in state attorney generals’ offices all across the country, and this is a problem. People are demanding prosecution..

Right now, the elites, or predator class, realize if they don’t move forward very quickly, they are going to lose everything. They could possibly end up facing true accountability. I think we are in a very dangerous situation now. When people get into a position like that, they don’t have a whole lot of options. Either they cancel the election or they cheat like crazy or they just collapse everything. The way things are going right now with inflation out of control, the food crisis and famine just around the corner, of course, that they engineered, and the monkey pox and bird flu, they have all there crises lined up...

You realize they have a lot of options still to play. I suspect there will be some very interesting developments between now and the mid-term elections. If we had honest elections, they would be totally creamed. They would be toast, and they know that.”

Newman thinks the next move by the Deep State may be a combination of crises that could include the collapse of the buying power of the U.S. dollar and a food crisis that is already a lock in the not-so-distant future. Newman warns,

"What’s going on in Russia and Ukraine, we cannot count out. There is a very real prospect of that expanding...

Desperate people do desperate things. This is just like with an animal that has been backed into a corner. When you get an animal in that situation, they are really left with few options other than attack and do something dangerous, and I think that is where we are at. They recognize that they need crises to advance their agenda. They need to terrify the population...

...and it has to be done in a way that their finger prints are not on this, and instead of people turning on each other, they will start looking for them.”

Newman says,

"The country can be turned around and it needs to be turned around, but it’s going to take work . . . and maybe intervention by the Good Lord.”

Newman closes by saying, "There is no silver bullet.”

- "The Deep State Is In A 'Do-Or-Die' Moment" - Alex Newman Warns Globalists 'Need To Terrify Everyone'

100 Companies To Blame For 71% Of Global Emissions?

Freedom Of Speech Needs "Recalibration" - Aussie Commissioner Sparks Outrage At WEF

The Climate Change Narrative Is Built to Empower Elites (Guest: Marc Morano) (audiocast)

Alibaba Pushes ‘Individual Carbon Footprint Tracker’ at Davos

World Economic Forum Says Go Vegan: Eat Seaweed, Algae, and Cacti to Save the Planet

No surprise, the WEF furnishes zany unhinged conspiracy theorists with mucho, almost unlimited material.

The Next Step for the World Economic Forum

These WEF monsters reveal their plans! Action season guns, race and babies! PRAY!

Are You Aware Hitler’s Buddy Was Klaus Schwab’s Dad, Eugen Who’s Name Is Found In The Word Eugenics??

Fact Check: Was Davos Founder Klaus Schwab's Father Hitler's 'Confidant'?

The New World Order Prepares Their Final Attack

"Why Does The World Economic Forum Have Its Own Police Unit With Heavy Weaponry?”

Russia and China planning simultaneous attack to ELIMINATE the United States (video)

Pfizer CEO Tells You Their Dream of Reducing World Population by 50% by 2023 Is Coming True (video)

At Davos 2022, All The Talk From The Global Elites Centered Around The Coming Metaverse Digital Prison They Have Planned For Us All To Enjoy

Truth history of the modern world

US Is "Beyond Bankrupt" - Kim Dotcom Fears "Controlled Demolition" Enabling A "New Dystopian Future"

Great Reset: Fake AI ‘Tamagotchi Children’ will be Common within 50 Years – Expert Says

But the WEF is too real to dismiss as a mere conspiracy theory, so it turns out that the above articles are worth reading.

Ewald von Kleist (1922-2013) Wolfgang Ischinger of Germany (1946-) Bill Gates at Munich Security Conference, Feb. 18, 2022

Another globalist menace to the world along with the WEF is the annual Munich Security Conference, founded in fall of 1963 (later held in Feb.) by Ewald-Heinrich Hermann Konrad Oskar Ulrich Wolf Alfred von Kleist-Schmenzin (1922-2013), a WWII German Wehrmacht officer who became the last surviving member of the failed July 20, 1944 plot to assassinate Hitler; he retired as conference convenor in 1998. In 2008 German ambassador (to the U.S. and U.K.) Wolfgang Friedrich Ischinger (1946-) became chmn. until 2022, when he became pres. of the Foundation Council. Funny how German crypto-Nazis are still running the world by other means? On Feb. 17, 2017 guess-who Bill Gates began attending as a vaccine expert, giving a speech that began: "When I decided 20 years ago to make global health the focus of my philanthropic work, I didn't imagine that I'd be speaking at a conference on international security policy. But I'm here today because I believe our worlds are more tightly linked than most people realize." At the time he claimed to be on a crusade to eradicate polio. On Feb. 18, 2022 Gates spoke at the conference as a member of a panel on dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic, claiming that the Omicron variant might not be the last one, and guess what, here comes Monkeypox.

--------------------

Want to see it all coming together before your eyes?

Russell Brand (1975-)
On May 22, 2022 the World Health Assembly of the U.N.'s WHO met in Geneva, Switzerland to discuss a new pandemic treaty, authorized to open for negotiations on Mar. 3 and set for a final draft in 2024, causing an online firestorm accusing the U.N. of plotting to steal U.S. sovereignty with the power to declare a global emergency over some future virus over the objections of nation-states, but worse, cancel the U.S. (after Pres. Trump is reelected?) by declaring climate change, gun ownership, or white supremacy to be pandemics, causing leftist but freethinking British comedian and blogosphere star Russell Edward Brand (1975-) to claim that if it is implemented, democracy would be "finished", and future historians would say "We lapsed into a terrible technocratic globalist agenda"; no surprise, Pres. Biden is all for it.

Russell Brand: “The Problem with ‘Following the Science’ Is that the Science Follows the Money”

Massive Lib Celeb Who Said Trump Was Right About Hillary Just Called Out Klaus Schwab's Plan

------------------------------------

On May 23, 2022 as U.S. gasoline prices topped $6/gal. in Calif., Pres. Biden spoke at the annual WEF meeting in Davos, Switzerland, finally admitting that all his previous 'splaining about why gasoline prices are the highest since the Flood was moose hockey, and that the price rises and inflation are purposeful, part of a"an incredible transition" to alternative energy his IPCC owner-trainers want to impose on the back of the U.S. sheeple, with the soundbyte: " "[When] it comes to the gas prices, we're going through an incredible transition that is taking place that, God willing, when it's over, we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels when this is over." No surprise, other WEF members back him up, with German vice-chancellor Robert Habeck opining that the transition will require "change to the rule of markets", and Norwegian finance CEO Kjerstin Braathen admitting that the transition will create energy shortages and inflation, but that the "pain is worth it." - Davos elites warn nations not to resist 'painful global transition'

Energy Sec Granholm: Soaring Gas Prices Are An ‘Exclamation Point’ That U.S. Must Accelerate Green Energy Push

Energy Crisis Is A Taste Of What The IEA Has In Store For Us

Flash! On May 24, 2022 Bill Gates shocked the 2022 WEF Davos Conference by admitting that current COVID-19 vaccines "don't have much in the way of duration and they're not good at infection blocking", with the soundbyte: "The idea of checking if people are vaccinated, you know if you have breakthrough infections, what's the point?"

------------------------------------

Wiki articles:

Climate change - all user edits blocked so that the U.N. IPCC fanatics can control what's disseminated to the public

Greenhouse effect

Population control

Racism

Communism

--------------------------------

P.S. There are two existential reasons I crusade so hard against the IPCC. One is fear and loathing of global Marxism, the other is sweet pure thermal physics, which trumps politics.

Suppose humans do not cut CO2 emissions. Is there an upper limit to how much surface temperature will increase in 100 years, 200 years, or 300 years? Will earth eventually become too hot to host any complex life in the next 10000 years? - by T.L. Winslow (TLW)

Time elapsed and atmospheric CO2 concentration are misdirection plays.

It’s a gigantic hoax that CO2 emissions have ANY effect on weather or climate. This is because atmospheric CO2 isn’t a Planck black body radiator like the surface of the Earth is, so it can’t absorb and emit radiation at all wavelengths, but in CO2’s case, only at 15 microns, which is not even heat, but is waste heat from the cooling of Earth’s surface by thermal radiation, with a black body temperature of only -80C, colder than dry ice. Claiming that atmospheric CO2 no matter how high the concentration can reverse Earth surface cooling and even make it hotter than the Sun did would be like claiming that residual heat in the mountains surrounding a city that just experienced an atomic bomb blast complete with fireball and mushroom cloud could make it explode again.

The hoax is being pushed by dedicated global Marxists centered in the U.N. and its IPCC who just want to make world leaders into useful idiots that will kill their own fossil fuel industries to help foist global Marxism.

As a historyscoper, I’d like to be alive 500 years from now to see how this ridiculous hoax finally got exposed to the general public. It boils down to pretending to find a pony in a river of manure then demanding 'all the money in the world to save it. And all academic institutions have been captured, so that no prominent scientist dares to speak out against it because they’re hoping for their global Marxist team to win. Even Jonathan Swift would roll over in his grave.

Where’s one prominent scientist who will publicly admit I’m right, get their academic institution to issue me a doctorate in thermal physics to give me credentials, then put my killer disproof cited below on a large enough Web site to handle a million hits a day before plugging it? It would make them humanity’s hero in the er, history books. Too bad, their institution would probably fire them and try to cancel them to keep the Marxist infiltration afloat. I’ll stand on my reputation 500 years from now either way.

-------------------------------------------------

Here's my killer disproof of the U.N. IPCC's greenhouse gas warming hoax using pure sweet thermal physics, the only branch that will never be overturned. The CO2 dog don't hunt. They need another getaway driver for their Great Train Robbery. Read and spread for humanity's betterment:

Why Are Greenhouse Gas Theories Dead Wrong?

-------------------------------------

Myron C. Fagan (1887-1972)

In 1967-8 Am. anti-Communist film-theater writer-producer-dir. Myron Coureval Fagan (1887-1972) recorded a 2.5-hour 3-LP set titled The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations, claiming to trace a grand Luciferian conspiracy dir. by the Rothschild family involving the Bavarian Illuminati, Communist revolutions in Russia, Red China, Cuba, et al., and encompassing "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", the Federal Reserve and U.S. federal income tax, the NAACP, the ADL, the Nazis and Fascists, WWI and WWII, and the U.N. In hindsight he was right-on despite a few factual errors?

-------------------------------------




Rebel News World Economic Forum Articles


What Is Environmentalism Ideology? by TLW

Why Are We Not Switching to Renewable Energy? by TLW

TLW's Communism Historyscope

TLW's United Nationsscope

TLW's Soroscope

TLW's Bidenscope

TLW's Obamascope

TLW's Hillaryscope

TLW's Wokescope

TLW's Climatescope

TLW's New Real Climate Science Course


Historyscoper Home Page







© Copyright by T.L. Winslow. All Rights Reserved.