Is Skepticism About Human-Caused Climate Change a Pseudoscience?

The ranks of AGW skeptics include a number of crackpots and non-scientist dabblers, which is to be expected because it’s still mainly a free world, along with a bunch of good dedicated independent scientists who face ostracism when they speak truth to power, but the real pseudoscientists are the leftist environmentalists and climate communists centered in the U.N. and their politician-run IPCC global octopus of kept scientists, academics, journalists, and politicians.

The so-called climate change field is dominated by the IPCC, which doesn’t tolerate boat rockers and independent thinkers and imposes a religious-like orthodoxy. Their official line is that nobody can be a climate scientist but them, hence everybody else is a pseudoscientific charlatan, even though a lot of their literature is riddled with pseudoscientific moose hockey.

They Live as our Scientists

Watch video

TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?

But there’s a big joke here, namely, that all along the CO2-driven AGW theory is a fake science hoax that is ruled out by sound physics, making virtually the enture mountain of scientific literature produced by the pro side at the U.N. IPCC into moose hockey that’s slated to be tossed into the dustbin of history.

I’ve studied more literature on the climate change subject, pro and con, than anybody, but after I figured out how physics demolishes the entire CO2-driven AGW theory, it has taken on a humorous aspect to me. Imagine Copernicus laughing at the Bible-thumper clerics who thought that the Sun and stars revolve around the Earth, never mind the Moon. Too bad, I should say it would be ROTFL funny if it weren’t so tragic, as I see billions and trillions wasted trying to stop a non-existent problem, and my voice is drowned out by the IPCC octopus, who are busy ringing the cash registers.

Imagine a mountain of literature reduced to a dust speck with a single short essay, and I wrote it. I dare you to prove I’m not a real scientist by disproving it. Thank heavens for Quora which gives me a platform despite the tiny audience I will attract compared to the giant stage the IPCC enjoys. You can be sure they won’t publicize it. It will be interesting to see how they end up facing the truth. No human organization can change the truth, especially the laws of physics.

The Big Lie About CO2, by TLW